From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:26:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4D33E7.4000303@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102042326.08607.j6t@kdbg.org>
Am 04.02.2011 23:26, schrieb Johannes Sixt:
> On Freitag, 4. Februar 2011, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> In commits be254a0ea9 and 7dce19d374 the handling of the new fetch options
>> "--[no-]recurse-submodules" had been added to git-pull.sh. This was not
>> necessary because all options to "git fetch" are passed to it and handled
>> there, so lets remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
>> ---
>>
>> I noticed this while implementing the on-demand recursive fetch.
>>
>> git-pull.sh | 10 ++--------
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-pull.sh b/git-pull.sh
>> index eb87f49..20a3bbe 100755
>> --- a/git-pull.sh
>> +++ b/git-pull.sh
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test -z "$(git ls-files -u)" || die_conflict
>> test -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" && die_merge
>>
>> strategy_args= diffstat= no_commit= squash= no_ff= ff_only=
>> -log_arg= verbosity= progress= recurse_submodules=
>> +log_arg= verbosity= progress=
>> merge_args=
>> curr_branch=$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)
>> curr_branch_short="${curr_branch#refs/heads/}"
>> @@ -105,12 +105,6 @@ do
>> --no-r|--no-re|--no-reb|--no-reba|--no-rebas|--no-rebase)
>> rebase=false
>> ;;
>> - --recurse-submodules)
>> - recurse_submodules=--recurse-submodules
>> - ;;
>> - --no-recurse-submodules)
>> - recurse_submodules=--no-recurse-submodules
>> - ;;
>> --d|--dr|--dry|--dry-|--dry-r|--dry-ru|--dry-run)
>> dry_run=--dry-run
>> ;;
>> @@ -223,7 +217,7 @@ test true = "$rebase" && {
>> done
>> }
>> orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD)
>> -git fetch $verbosity $progress $dry_run $recurse_submodules
>> --update-head-ok "$@" || exit 1
>>> +git fetch $verbosity $progress $dry_run
>> --update-head-ok "$@" || exit 1 test -z "$dry_run" || exit 0
>>
>> curr_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD)
>
> Huh? What will, for example,
>
> git pull --recurse-submodules --no-ff origin
>
> do before and after your patch? Doesn't your patch force users to
> write --[no-]recurse-submodules last?
Yes, but isn't that exactly what the pull man-page says? Quote:
"Options meant for git pull itself and the underlying git merge
must be given before the options meant for git fetch."
(The reason I added this option handling in the first place was
that I hadn't been aware of this at that time either ... ;-)
Thanks for your review!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-05 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 20:17 [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch Jens Lehmann
2011-02-04 22:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-02-05 11:26 ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2011-02-06 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-06 21:59 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 22:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-06 22:57 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 7:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-07 19:27 ` [PATCH v2] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 22:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Jens Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4D33E7.4000303@web.de \
--to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.