All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4F273C.8030003@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110206220939.GC17210@elie>

Am 06.02.2011 23:09, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 06.02.2011 21:45, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:
> 
>>>> Yes, but isn't that exactly what the pull man-page says? Quote:
>>>> "Options meant for git pull itself and the underlying git merge
>>>> must be given before the options meant for git fetch."
>>>
>>> Yes, it says that, and I think that was a weasely way to say "the command
>>> line parser in git-pull is broken".
> [...]
>> (CCed Jonathan, as he is the author of the lines I quoted)
> 
> They're from Junio. :)  See v1.5.4.5~26 (git-pull documentation: warn
> about the option order, 2008-03-10).

And I thought I could trust "git blame -M -C" ... ;-)

> I also agree that (1) it would be very nice to find a way to fix this
> and (2) until then, it seems best as a general principle not to
> regress in those odd cases where we sort of fixed it.
> 
> In other words, if we were adding --recurse-submodules today, I'd
> agree that it should be treated like other fetch options, but we
> already added the option and some people/scripts might be used to
> the added flexibility, no?

Ok, even though that option was added only two months ago, somebody
could already use it. So that leaves option two:

1) Drop the patch I proposed

2) Document "--[no-]recurse-submodules" as " as "git pull" options

(And then I can later pass the same option to "git merge", which is
much better than the solutions I came up with ;-)

Maybe something like this?

-------------8<--------------
Subject: [PATCH] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options

In commits be254a0ea9 and 7dce19d374 the handling of the new fetch options
"--[no-]recurse-submodules" had been added to git-pull.sh. But they were
not documented as the pull options they now are, so let's fix that.

Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
---
 Documentation/fetch-options.txt |    2 +-
 Documentation/git-pull.txt      |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/fetch-options.txt b/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
index 695696d..ab0dbfc 100644
--- a/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
+++ b/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ ifndef::git-pull[]
 	downloaded. The default behavior for a remote may be
 	specified with the remote.<name>.tagopt setting. See
 	linkgit:git-config[1].
-endif::git-pull[]

 --[no-]recurse-submodules::
 	This option controls if new commits of all populated submodules should
 	be fetched too (see linkgit:git-config[1] and linkgit:gitmodules[5]).
+endif::git-pull[]

 ifndef::git-pull[]
 --submodule-prefix=<path>::
diff --git a/Documentation/git-pull.txt b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
index 3046691..7d0f601 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-pull.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ must be given before the options meant for 'git fetch'.
 --verbose::
 	Pass --verbose to git-fetch and git-merge.

+--[no-]recurse-submodules::
+	This option controls if new commits of all populated submodules should
+	be fetched too (see linkgit:git-config[1] and linkgit:gitmodules[5]).
+
 Options related to merging
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
1.7.4.31.g5ae186.dirty

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-06 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-04 20:17 [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch Jens Lehmann
2011-02-04 22:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-02-05 11:26   ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 20:45     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-06 21:59       ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 22:09         ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-06 22:57           ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2011-02-07  7:41             ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-07 19:27               ` [PATCH v2] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 21:42                 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 22:24                   ` [PATCH v3] " Jens Lehmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4F273C.8030003@web.de \
    --to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.