From: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>,
davidb@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] msm: iommu: Generalize platform data for multiple targets
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:00:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D55A372.9090705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297457899.4852.14.camel@m0nster>
On 02/11/11 12:58, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 12:51 -0800, Steve Muckle wrote:
>> On 02/11/11 12:42, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>>> static struct resource msm_iommu_jpegd_resources[] = {
>>>> {
>>>> - .start = MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_PHYS,
>>>> - .end = MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_PHYS + MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_SIZE - 1,
>>>> + .start = 0x07300000,
>>>> + .end = 0x07300000 + SZ_1M - 1,
>>>
>>> Looks worse .. Just put the macros into a static header file for both.
>>
>> Why bother defining macros for these if they only appear here? I don't
>> think that adds any value or readability - these addresses are clearly
>> the physical area for the msm_iommu_jpegd. It just makes it more
>> annoying to have to look up the values in a separate file if you are
>> wondering what they are.
>
> So your saying if you look at the number 0x07300000 you instantly know
> that this JPEGD?
Yes, because it's the start address for the msm_iommu_jpegd resource.
thanks,
Steve
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: smuckle@codeaurora.org (Steve Muckle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] msm: iommu: Generalize platform data for multiple targets
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:00:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D55A372.9090705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297457899.4852.14.camel@m0nster>
On 02/11/11 12:58, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 12:51 -0800, Steve Muckle wrote:
>> On 02/11/11 12:42, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>>> static struct resource msm_iommu_jpegd_resources[] = {
>>>> {
>>>> - .start = MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_PHYS,
>>>> - .end = MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_PHYS + MSM_IOMMU_JPEGD_SIZE - 1,
>>>> + .start = 0x07300000,
>>>> + .end = 0x07300000 + SZ_1M - 1,
>>>
>>> Looks worse .. Just put the macros into a static header file for both.
>>
>> Why bother defining macros for these if they only appear here? I don't
>> think that adds any value or readability - these addresses are clearly
>> the physical area for the msm_iommu_jpegd. It just makes it more
>> annoying to have to look up the values in a separate file if you are
>> wondering what they are.
>
> So your saying if you look at the number 0x07300000 you instantly know
> that this JPEGD?
Yes, because it's the start address for the msm_iommu_jpegd resource.
thanks,
Steve
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-11 20:28 [PATCH 1/3] msm: iommu: Create a Kconfig item for the IOMMU driver Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:28 ` Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] msm: iommu: Generalize platform data for multiple targets Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:28 ` Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:42 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 20:42 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 20:51 ` Steve Muckle
2011-02-11 20:51 ` Steve Muckle
2011-02-11 20:58 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 20:58 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 21:00 ` Steve Muckle [this message]
2011-02-11 21:00 ` Steve Muckle
2011-02-11 21:03 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 21:03 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 21:03 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 21:03 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 21:14 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 21:14 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 21:53 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 21:53 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 22:00 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 22:00 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 22:12 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 22:12 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 22:37 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 22:37 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 22:47 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 22:47 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 23:16 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 23:16 ` David Brown
2011-02-11 23:35 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 23:35 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] msm: iommu: Enable IOMMU support for MSM8960 Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:28 ` Stepan Moskovchenko
2011-02-11 20:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] msm: iommu: Create a Kconfig item for the IOMMU driver Daniel Walker
2011-02-11 20:38 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-15 19:35 ` David Brown
2011-02-15 19:35 ` David Brown
2011-02-15 19:49 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-15 19:49 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-25 0:12 ` David Brown
2011-02-25 0:12 ` David Brown
2011-02-16 0:36 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-16 0:36 ` Daniel Walker
2011-02-16 0:36 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D55A372.9090705@codeaurora.org \
--to=smuckle@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stepanm@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.