From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
cl@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V2] net,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:53:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6CB414.8050107@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110301.001638.104075130.davem@davemloft.net>
On 03/01/2011 04:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:03:44 +0800
>
>>
>> struct dst_entry assumes the size of struct rcu_head as 2 * sizeof(long)
>> and manually adds pads for aligning for "__refcnt".
>>
>> When the size of struct rcu_head is changed, these manual padding
>> is wrong. Use __attribute__((aligned (64))) instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> We don't want to use the align if it's going to waste lots of space.
>
> Instead we want to rearrange the structure so that the alignment comes
> more cheaply.
Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V2] net,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head
struct dst_entry assumes the size of struct rcu_head as 2 * sizeof(long)
and manually adds pads for aligning for "__refcnt".
When the size of struct rcu_head is changed, these manual padding
are hardly suit for the changes. So we rearrange the structure,
and move the seldom access rcu_head to the end of the structure.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
index 93b0310..d8c5296 100644
--- a/include/net/dst.h
+++ b/include/net/dst.h
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
struct sk_buff;
struct dst_entry {
- struct rcu_head rcu_head;
struct dst_entry *child;
struct net_device *dev;
short error;
@@ -78,6 +77,13 @@ struct dst_entry {
__u32 __pad2;
#endif
+ unsigned long lastuse;
+ union {
+ struct dst_entry *next;
+ struct rtable __rcu *rt_next;
+ struct rt6_info *rt6_next;
+ struct dn_route __rcu *dn_next;
+ };
/*
* Align __refcnt to a 64 bytes alignment
@@ -92,13 +98,7 @@ struct dst_entry {
*/
atomic_t __refcnt; /* client references */
int __use;
- unsigned long lastuse;
- union {
- struct dst_entry *next;
- struct rtable __rcu *rt_next;
- struct rt6_info *rt6_next;
- struct dn_route __rcu *dn_next;
- };
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
#ifdef __KERNEL__
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
cl@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, mpm@selenic.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V2] net,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:53:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6CB414.8050107@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110301.001638.104075130.davem@davemloft.net>
On 03/01/2011 04:16 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:03:44 +0800
>
>>
>> struct dst_entry assumes the size of struct rcu_head as 2 * sizeof(long)
>> and manually adds pads for aligning for "__refcnt".
>>
>> When the size of struct rcu_head is changed, these manual padding
>> is wrong. Use __attribute__((aligned (64))) instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> We don't want to use the align if it's going to waste lots of space.
>
> Instead we want to rearrange the structure so that the alignment comes
> more cheaply.
Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V2] net,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head
struct dst_entry assumes the size of struct rcu_head as 2 * sizeof(long)
and manually adds pads for aligning for "__refcnt".
When the size of struct rcu_head is changed, these manual padding
are hardly suit for the changes. So we rearrange the structure,
and move the seldom access rcu_head to the end of the structure.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
index 93b0310..d8c5296 100644
--- a/include/net/dst.h
+++ b/include/net/dst.h
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
struct sk_buff;
struct dst_entry {
- struct rcu_head rcu_head;
struct dst_entry *child;
struct net_device *dev;
short error;
@@ -78,6 +77,13 @@ struct dst_entry {
__u32 __pad2;
#endif
+ unsigned long lastuse;
+ union {
+ struct dst_entry *next;
+ struct rtable __rcu *rt_next;
+ struct rt6_info *rt6_next;
+ struct dn_route __rcu *dn_next;
+ };
/*
* Align __refcnt to a 64 bytes alignment
@@ -92,13 +98,7 @@ struct dst_entry {
*/
atomic_t __refcnt; /* client references */
int __use;
- unsigned long lastuse;
- union {
- struct dst_entry *next;
- struct rtable __rcu *rt_next;
- struct rt6_info *rt6_next;
- struct dn_route __rcu *dn_next;
- };
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
#ifdef __KERNEL__
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 8:03 [PATCH 4/4] net,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-01 8:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-01 8:16 ` David Miller
2011-03-01 8:16 ` David Miller
2011-03-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:53 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2011-03-01 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/4 V2] " Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-01 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 2:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-02 2:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-02 3:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 3:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 3:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6CB414.8050107@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.