Re: [PATCH 3/3] don't create kvmclock when one of the flags are present.

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]

On 2011-03-17 23:42, Glauber Costa wrote:
> kvmclock presence can be signalled by two different flags. So for
> device creation, we have to test for both.

Patch is OK, but the subject's logic is inverted.

Jan

> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/kvmclock.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/kvmclock.c b/hw/kvmclock.c
> index b6ceddf..004c4ad 100644
> --- a/hw/kvmclock.c
> +++ b/hw/kvmclock.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,11 @@ static SysBusDeviceInfo kvmclock_info = {
>  void kvmclock_create(void)
>  {
>      if (kvm_enabled() &&
> -        first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)) {
> +        first_cpu->cpuid_kvm_features & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE)
> +#ifdef KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2
> +        || (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2)
> +#endif
> +    )) {
>          sysbus_create_simple("kvmclock", -1, NULL);
>      }
>  }


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]