From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: fix kconfig dependency warning
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:01:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D91F432.2070406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301382178.2816.69.camel@localhost>
On 03/29/11 00:02, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 13:40 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>
>> Fix another kconfig dependency warning, this time in ubifs.
>>
>> warning: (UBIFS_FS_DEBUG && LOCKDEP && LATENCYTOP) selects KALLSYMS_ALL which has unmet direct dependencies (DEBUG_KERNEL && KALLSYMS)
>>
>> Without this patch, we can have:
>> # CONFIG_KALLSYMS is not set
>> CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
>> which is useless (does nothing unless KALLSYMS is enabled).
>>
>> However, ubifs builds successfully with or without this patch,
>> and it builds with this line completely deleted,
>> so what was this 'select' for? Just developer convenience?
>
> Well, here is the idea. You can compile UBIFS with debugging and without
> debugging. Without debugging the resulting ubifs.ko is much smaller, so
> some embedded people prefer it this way.
>
> If you select debugging support, then we'll compile it a lot of
> assertions, self-checks, test-modes, extra error messages with detailed
> dumps. And we want to see stackdumps when errors or problems happen,
> this is why we select KALLSYMS_ALL.
>
> So I guess instead we should do:
>
> select KALLSYMS
> select KALLSYMS_ALL
Yes, that should do it. Thanks for the explanation.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: fix kconfig dependency warning
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:01:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D91F432.2070406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301382178.2816.69.camel@localhost>
On 03/29/11 00:02, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 13:40 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>
>> Fix another kconfig dependency warning, this time in ubifs.
>>
>> warning: (UBIFS_FS_DEBUG && LOCKDEP && LATENCYTOP) selects KALLSYMS_ALL which has unmet direct dependencies (DEBUG_KERNEL && KALLSYMS)
>>
>> Without this patch, we can have:
>> # CONFIG_KALLSYMS is not set
>> CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
>> which is useless (does nothing unless KALLSYMS is enabled).
>>
>> However, ubifs builds successfully with or without this patch,
>> and it builds with this line completely deleted,
>> so what was this 'select' for? Just developer convenience?
>
> Well, here is the idea. You can compile UBIFS with debugging and without
> debugging. Without debugging the resulting ubifs.ko is much smaller, so
> some embedded people prefer it this way.
>
> If you select debugging support, then we'll compile it a lot of
> assertions, self-checks, test-modes, extra error messages with detailed
> dumps. And we want to see stackdumps when errors or problems happen,
> this is why we select KALLSYMS_ALL.
>
> So I guess instead we should do:
>
> select KALLSYMS
> select KALLSYMS_ALL
Yes, that should do it. Thanks for the explanation.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 20:40 [PATCH] ubifs: fix kconfig dependency warning Randy Dunlap
2011-03-28 20:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-29 7:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-29 7:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-29 15:01 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-03-29 15:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-29 15:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-29 15:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-29 15:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Randy Dunlap
2011-03-29 15:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-30 8:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-30 8:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-30 17:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-30 17:34 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D91F432.2070406@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.