All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	John Linn <John.Linn@xilinx.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	l-o <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC, GIC based smp_cross_call cleanup suggestion
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 11:53:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D98124B.6090005@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim+bco_90iPLrc1ioV4bdSw+LRzQQ@mail.gmail.com>

+ Thomas G,

On 4/2/2011 2:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>  wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:55:02PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, John Linn<John.Linn@xilinx.com>  wrote:
>>>> I’m getting ready to submit a patch to add SMP to Xilinx code. I notice that
>>>> smp_cross_call for all GIC based platforms is duplicated across each
>>>> platform in smp.h.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I thought I’d try to jump in to help with some cleanup, although I realize
>>>> it’s minimal, I have to start somewhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about moving the smp_cross_call for GIC based designs into gic.h?
>>>
>>> Go for it.  It's an obvious cleanup.
>>
>> That assumes that all SMP implementations will always have a GIC.  It
>> looks to me like this is conditional on shmobile, and so I don't think
>> its that trivial - maybe Paul or Magnus can first indicate why this is.
>
> OMAP4 may also require a custom smp_cross_call implementation if CPU
> idle is going to be supported in SMP - in CPU off idle modes, a GIC
> SGI will not wake the CPU, and a write directly to the CPU's power
> management controller or an external interrupt source would be
> required.

This can be done without making smp_cross_call() platform
specific.
While working on broad-cast notifiers for ARM with Thomas G, this
point was discussed.

Where the TWD can't wakeup its own local CPU from C3 mode, how do we
provide a platform specific method to perform this wakeup ?

Thomas Quoted....
"It would not complicate the OMAP code that much. All it needs is
extending the clock event device callbacks by an broadcast_affinity()
function which would be called from the broadcast code when the
broadcast device is armed. The argument would be a cpumask which would
tell you which core(s) to wake up when the broadcast timer fires next.

So OMAP would fill in that hook and implement the wakeup redirector
setup, which I guess would be a couple of lines."

 From above it's should be trivial once the broad-cast notifiers
are extended to have "broadcast_affinity()" supported

Regards
Santosh



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RFC, GIC based smp_cross_call cleanup suggestion
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 11:53:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D98124B.6090005@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim+bco_90iPLrc1ioV4bdSw+LRzQQ@mail.gmail.com>

+ Thomas G,

On 4/2/2011 2:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>  wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:55:02PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, John Linn<John.Linn@xilinx.com>  wrote:
>>>> I?m getting ready to submit a patch to add SMP to Xilinx code. I notice that
>>>> smp_cross_call for all GIC based platforms is duplicated across each
>>>> platform in smp.h.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I thought I?d try to jump in to help with some cleanup, although I realize
>>>> it?s minimal, I have to start somewhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What about moving the smp_cross_call for GIC based designs into gic.h?
>>>
>>> Go for it.  It's an obvious cleanup.
>>
>> That assumes that all SMP implementations will always have a GIC.  It
>> looks to me like this is conditional on shmobile, and so I don't think
>> its that trivial - maybe Paul or Magnus can first indicate why this is.
>
> OMAP4 may also require a custom smp_cross_call implementation if CPU
> idle is going to be supported in SMP - in CPU off idle modes, a GIC
> SGI will not wake the CPU, and a write directly to the CPU's power
> management controller or an external interrupt source would be
> required.

This can be done without making smp_cross_call() platform
specific.
While working on broad-cast notifiers for ARM with Thomas G, this
point was discussed.

Where the TWD can't wakeup its own local CPU from C3 mode, how do we
provide a platform specific method to perform this wakeup ?

Thomas Quoted....
"It would not complicate the OMAP code that much. All it needs is
extending the clock event device callbacks by an broadcast_affinity()
function which would be called from the broadcast code when the
broadcast device is armed. The argument would be a cpumask which would
tell you which core(s) to wake up when the broadcast timer fires next.

So OMAP would fill in that hook and implement the wakeup redirector
setup, which I guess would be a couple of lines."

 From above it's should be trivial once the broad-cast notifiers
are extended to have "broadcast_affinity()" supported

Regards
Santosh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-03  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01 22:27 RFC, GIC based smp_cross_call cleanup suggestion John Linn
2011-04-01 22:55 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-02  8:51   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-02  9:10     ` Colin Cross
2011-04-03  4:47       ` Grant Likely
2011-04-03 10:37         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-03 10:53           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-03 11:46             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-03 12:00               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-03 13:48             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-04  8:20               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-04  8:20                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-04  8:25                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-04  8:25                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-04  8:33                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-04  8:33                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-03 21:15           ` John Linn
2011-04-04  8:30             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-03  6:23       ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-04-03  6:23         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-03  6:36         ` Colin Cross
2011-04-03  6:36           ` Colin Cross
2011-04-03  3:37     ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-03 10:03       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-02  9:03   ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D98124B.6090005@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=John.Linn@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ccross@google.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.