From: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@stericsson.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9D676E.6090608@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9D12FD.6060608@codeaurora.org>
On 04/07/2011 03:27 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Isn't this a big in the existing code too? I would prefer not combining
> that with this patch series. That bug should be fixed before/after this
> patch series. Not as part of it.
>
> I would vote for after this patch series since this patch series has
> been trying to get in for quite a while now.
Ok for me.
Leave it as is and I'll send a patch on top of it.
Yours,
Mattias Wallin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mattias.wallin@stericsson.com (Mattias Wallin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9D676E.6090608@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9D12FD.6060608@codeaurora.org>
On 04/07/2011 03:27 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Isn't this a big in the existing code too? I would prefer not combining
> that with this patch series. That bug should be fixed before/after this
> patch series. Not as part of it.
>
> I would vote for after this patch series since this patch series has
> been trying to get in for quite a while now.
Ok for me.
Leave it as is and I'll send a patch on top of it.
Yours,
Mattias Wallin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@stericsson.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9D676E.6090608@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9D12FD.6060608@codeaurora.org>
On 04/07/2011 03:27 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Isn't this a big in the existing code too? I would prefer not combining
> that with this patch series. That bug should be fixed before/after this
> patch series. Not as part of it.
>
> I would vote for after this patch series since this patch series has
> been trying to get in for quite a while now.
Ok for me.
Leave it as is and I'll send a patch on top of it.
Yours,
Mattias Wallin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 23:56 [PATCHv5 0/3] Constant udelay() for SMP and non-SMP systems Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-06 8:49 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-06 8:49 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-06 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-06 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07 1:27 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-04-07 1:27 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-04-07 7:27 ` Mattias Wallin [this message]
2011-04-07 7:27 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:27 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:29 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:29 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07 7:30 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:30 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:30 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 3/3] ARM: Implement a timer based __delay() loop Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07 7:30 ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07 7:30 ` Mattias Wallin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9D676E.6090608@stericsson.com \
--to=mattias.wallin@stericsson.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.