* Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion @ 2011-04-09 12:04 Robert Berger 2011-04-10 3:45 ` Scott Garman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Robert Berger @ 2011-04-09 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto Hi, Can someone please tell me if there is a tag in git://git.pokylinux.org/poky.git which corresponds to the official release tarball and what it is? What puzzles me is that if you check out bernard-5.0 from the git repository it does not correspond to http://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/poky/poky-bernard-5.0.tar.bz2 OK, it does not seem to be anything seriously different between the two: # modified: README.hardware # modified: documentation/adt-manual/adt-prepare.xml # modified: documentation/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml # modified: meta/conf/distro/poky.conf ... but you might want to synchronize since some people prefer to work from git and others from the tarball. As an example the README.hardware found in the tarball suggests to build and update u-boot for the Freescale MPC8315E-RDB, which does not exist in the git repo. Regards, Robert ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-09 12:04 Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion Robert Berger @ 2011-04-10 3:45 ` Scott Garman 2011-04-10 6:58 ` Robert Berger 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Scott Garman @ 2011-04-10 3:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On 04/09/2011 05:04 AM, Robert Berger wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please tell me if there is a tag in > git://git.pokylinux.org/poky.git which corresponds to the official > release tarball and what it is? > > What puzzles me is that if you check out bernard-5.0 from the git > repository it does not correspond to > http://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/poky/poky-bernard-5.0.tar.bz2 > > OK, it does not seem to be anything seriously different between the two: > > # modified: README.hardware > # modified: documentation/adt-manual/adt-prepare.xml > # modified: documentation/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml > # modified: meta/conf/distro/poky.conf > > ... but you might want to synchronize since some people prefer to work > from git and others from the tarball. > > As an example the README.hardware found in the tarball suggests to build > and update u-boot for the Freescale MPC8315E-RDB, which does not exist > in the git repo. This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. Note: if you use git fetch --all, that will fetch new tags but doesn't update old ones that have moved - you need to explicitly run git fetch --tags. HTH, Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-10 3:45 ` Scott Garman @ 2011-04-10 6:58 ` Robert Berger 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Robert Berger @ 2011-04-10 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto Hi Scott, > > This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The > tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds > like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. > > Note: if you use git fetch --all, that will fetch new tags but doesn't > update old ones that have moved - you need to explicitly run git fetch > --tags. Thanks, you are absolutely right: git pull is not enough;) git fetch --tags From git://git.pokylinux.org/poky - [tag update] bernard-5.0 -> bernard-5.0 > > HTH, > > Scott > Regards, Robert ..."The scientific name for an animal that doesn't either run from or fight its enemies is lunch." - Michael Friedman My public pgp key is available at: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90320BF1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-10 3:45 ` Scott Garman 2011-04-10 6:58 ` Robert Berger @ 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk 2011-04-18 17:22 ` Darren Hart 2011-04-18 19:28 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-04-10 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott Garman; +Cc: yocto Dear Scott Garman, In message <4DA127F6.3010006@intel.com> you wrote: > > This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The > tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds > like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. You are ... moving release tags? Grrrgh!!! Could you please stop doing this? Nobody ever expects such a thing. And while we are at it: It would also be great if you could GPG-sign the tags. Thanks. Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "He only drinks when he gets depressed." "Why does he get depressed?" "Sometimes it's because he hasn't had a drink." - Terry Pratchett, _Men at Arms_ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-04-18 17:22 ` Darren Hart 2011-04-18 17:38 ` Scott Garman 2011-04-18 19:28 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2011-04-18 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: yocto, Scott Garman On 04/10/2011 01:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Garman, > > In message <4DA127F6.3010006@intel.com> you wrote: >> >> This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The >> tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds >> like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. > > You are ... moving release tags? Grrrgh!!! Oh, that surprises me as well. What is the justification here? Generally speaking, I'd expect the tags to be static. -- Darren > > Could you please stop doing this? Nobody ever expects such a thing. > And while we are at it: It would also be great if you could > GPG-sign the tags. > > Thanks. > > Wolfgang Denk > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-18 17:22 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-04-18 17:38 ` Scott Garman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Scott Garman @ 2011-04-18 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hart, Darren; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On 04/18/2011 10:22 AM, Hart, Darren wrote: > On 04/10/2011 01:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Scott Garman, >> >> In message<4DA127F6.3010006@intel.com> you wrote: >>> >>> This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The >>> tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds >>> like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. >> >> You are ... moving release tags? Grrrgh!!! > > Oh, that surprises me as well. What is the justification here? Generally > speaking, I'd expect the tags to be static. I'm cc'ing Beth on this thread, since I was not involved in the tag move. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk 2011-04-18 17:22 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-04-18 19:28 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 2011-04-19 7:30 ` Wolfgang Denk 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Elizabeth Flanagan @ 2011-04-18 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto On 04/10/2011 01:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Garman, > > In message<4DA127F6.3010006@intel.com> you wrote: >> >> This suggests to me that your local git repository isn't up to date. The >> tag has been moved at least once since it was created, and it sounds >> like your repository is behind the most recent move of the tag. > > You are ... moving release tags? Grrrgh!!! > > Could you please stop doing this? Nobody ever expects such a thing. > And while we are at it: It would also be great if you could > GPG-sign the tags. > > Thanks. > > Wolfgang Denk > Wolfgang, Yes, there was a problem with what I assumed would be our bernard-5.0 release and the tag needed to be moved, which, while a messy practice, was the only available option at the time. The tag shouldn't have been created until after verification of the RC. I'll make sure that this is captured in our release process. If you want, please feel free to open up a bug in bugzilla and assign it to me. As this was a relatively new process, I knew we'd hit some snags. This was one of them, and I'll make sure this is captured in our process so that we don't hit it again. Thanks for the feedback. ------------------ Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Release Engineer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-18 19:28 ` Elizabeth Flanagan @ 2011-04-19 7:30 ` Wolfgang Denk 2011-04-19 16:27 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-04-19 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Elizabeth Flanagan; +Cc: yocto Dear Elizabeth Flanagan, In message <4DAC90D3.3050905@intel.com> you wrote: > > > Yes, there was a problem with what I assumed would be our bernard-5.0 release and the tag needed to be moved, which, > while a messy practice, was the only available option at the time. The tag shouldn't have been created until after > verification of the RC. I'll make sure that this is captured in our release process. If you want, please feel free to > open up a bug in bugzilla and assign it to me. As this was a relatively new process, I knew we'd hit some snags. This > was one of them, and I'll make sure this is captured in our process so that we don't hit it again. I know that such things happen, but then it would have been at least a good idea to post some information about this - as mentioned, nobody expects that git tags get moved. Do you also plan to GPG-sign the tags? Note that annotated tags would also help a lot for example with commands like "git describe". Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion 2011-04-19 7:30 ` Wolfgang Denk @ 2011-04-19 16:27 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Elizabeth Flanagan @ 2011-04-19 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Denk; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On 04/19/2011 12:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Elizabeth Flanagan, > > In message<4DAC90D3.3050905@intel.com> you wrote: >> >> >> Yes, there was a problem with what I assumed would be our bernard-5.0 release and the tag needed to be moved, which, >> while a messy practice, was the only available option at the time. The tag shouldn't have been created until after >> verification of the RC. I'll make sure that this is captured in our release process. If you want, please feel free to >> open up a bug in bugzilla and assign it to me. As this was a relatively new process, I knew we'd hit some snags. This >> was one of them, and I'll make sure this is captured in our process so that we don't hit it again. > > I know that such things happen, but then it would have been at least a > good idea to post some information about this - as mentioned, nobody > expects that git tags get moved. > > > Do you also plan to GPG-sign the tags? We certainly should be doing this. I have some automation of release process tasks coming up, and will make sure that that is part of it. I want to think about how this is going to be done, process wise, and implement an automated process that takes gpg signing and tag annotation into account, instead of doing it one way (manually) and switching midstream to an automated process that may be different. So, short answer, is yes, we should be doing that. Long answer is "Let's do it via the automated release process so we can ensure it's repeatable." -b ------------------ Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Release Engineer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-19 16:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-04-09 12:04 Poky release is 5.0 "Bernard" confusion Robert Berger 2011-04-10 3:45 ` Scott Garman 2011-04-10 6:58 ` Robert Berger 2011-04-10 8:24 ` Wolfgang Denk 2011-04-18 17:22 ` Darren Hart 2011-04-18 17:38 ` Scott Garman 2011-04-18 19:28 ` Elizabeth Flanagan 2011-04-19 7:30 ` Wolfgang Denk 2011-04-19 16:27 ` Elizabeth Flanagan
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.