All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>
To: cernekee@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net, David.Woodhouse@intel.com,
	lethal@linux-sh.org, tj@kernel.orglethal@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: console_cpu_notify can cause scheduling BUG during CPU hotplug
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:33:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB604C7.8090305@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi,

I've run into a crash scenario during CPU hotplug on ARM/MSM where we 
BUG() due to a schedule while atomic in v2.6.38-rc6. The issue appears 
to be that the console cpu notifier can block on a semaphore during 
cpu_stopper_thread's atomic code path. Preemption is explicitly disabled 
in cpu_stopper_thread.

The suspected path was added with this commit:

commit 034260d6779087431a8b2f67589c68b919299e5c
Author: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 3 22:11:25 2010 -0700

     printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events

I was curious if this scenario was accounted for in the design of the 
console CPU notifier. One workaround for this problem is to remove 
CPU_DEAD from the possible actions in console_cpu_notify(). In fact, 
v1-v4 of the patch above did not have CPU_DEAD, CPU_DYING or 
CPU_DOWN_FAILED in the list of actions. I wasn't able to track down why 
the other cases were added in the final patch.

Crash log:

<3>[   21.408237] BUG: scheduling while atomic: migration/1/371/0x00000002
<4>[   21.408247] Modules linked in:
<4>[   21.408286] [<c0050e40>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x128) from 
[<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4)
<4>[   21.408303] [<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4) from [<c0567d04>] 
(schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208)
<4>[   21.408319] [<c0567d04>] (schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208) from 
[<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98)
<4>[   21.408337] [<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98) from [<c00d844c>] 
(down+0x2c/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408354] [<c00d844c>] (down+0x2c/0x3c) from [<c00bb23c>] 
(console_lock+0x38/0x60)
<4>[   21.408377] [<c00bb23c>] (console_lock+0x38/0x60) from 
[<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c)
<4>[   21.408394] [<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c) from 
[<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70)
<4>[   21.408410] [<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70) from 
[<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408425] [<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c) from 
[<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34)
<4>[   21.408444] [<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34) from 
[<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c)
<4>[   21.408462] [<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c) from 
[<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160)
<4>[   21.408482] [<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160) from 
[<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
<4>[   21.408498] [<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88) from [<c004b6a0>] 
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mbohan@codeaurora.org (Michael Bohan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: console_cpu_notify can cause scheduling BUG during CPU hotplug
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:33:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB604C7.8090305@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi,

I've run into a crash scenario during CPU hotplug on ARM/MSM where we 
BUG() due to a schedule while atomic in v2.6.38-rc6. The issue appears 
to be that the console cpu notifier can block on a semaphore during 
cpu_stopper_thread's atomic code path. Preemption is explicitly disabled 
in cpu_stopper_thread.

The suspected path was added with this commit:

commit 034260d6779087431a8b2f67589c68b919299e5c
Author: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 3 22:11:25 2010 -0700

     printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events

I was curious if this scenario was accounted for in the design of the 
console CPU notifier. One workaround for this problem is to remove 
CPU_DEAD from the possible actions in console_cpu_notify(). In fact, 
v1-v4 of the patch above did not have CPU_DEAD, CPU_DYING or 
CPU_DOWN_FAILED in the list of actions. I wasn't able to track down why 
the other cases were added in the final patch.

Crash log:

<3>[   21.408237] BUG: scheduling while atomic: migration/1/371/0x00000002
<4>[   21.408247] Modules linked in:
<4>[   21.408286] [<c0050e40>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x128) from 
[<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4)
<4>[   21.408303] [<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4) from [<c0567d04>] 
(schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208)
<4>[   21.408319] [<c0567d04>] (schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208) from 
[<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98)
<4>[   21.408337] [<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98) from [<c00d844c>] 
(down+0x2c/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408354] [<c00d844c>] (down+0x2c/0x3c) from [<c00bb23c>] 
(console_lock+0x38/0x60)
<4>[   21.408377] [<c00bb23c>] (console_lock+0x38/0x60) from 
[<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c)
<4>[   21.408394] [<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c) from 
[<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70)
<4>[   21.408410] [<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70) from 
[<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408425] [<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c) from 
[<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34)
<4>[   21.408444] [<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34) from 
[<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c)
<4>[   21.408462] [<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c) from 
[<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160)
<4>[   21.408482] [<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160) from 
[<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
<4>[   21.408498] [<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88) from [<c004b6a0>] 
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>
To: cernekee@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net, David.Woodhouse@intel.com,
	lethal@linux-sh.org, tj@kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: console_cpu_notify can cause scheduling BUG during CPU hotplug
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:33:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB604C7.8090305@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Hi,

I've run into a crash scenario during CPU hotplug on ARM/MSM where we 
BUG() due to a schedule while atomic in v2.6.38-rc6. The issue appears 
to be that the console cpu notifier can block on a semaphore during 
cpu_stopper_thread's atomic code path. Preemption is explicitly disabled 
in cpu_stopper_thread.

The suspected path was added with this commit:

commit 034260d6779087431a8b2f67589c68b919299e5c
Author: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 3 22:11:25 2010 -0700

     printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events

I was curious if this scenario was accounted for in the design of the 
console CPU notifier. One workaround for this problem is to remove 
CPU_DEAD from the possible actions in console_cpu_notify(). In fact, 
v1-v4 of the patch above did not have CPU_DEAD, CPU_DYING or 
CPU_DOWN_FAILED in the list of actions. I wasn't able to track down why 
the other cases were added in the final patch.

Crash log:

<3>[   21.408237] BUG: scheduling while atomic: migration/1/371/0x00000002
<4>[   21.408247] Modules linked in:
<4>[   21.408286] [<c0050e40>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x128) from 
[<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4)
<4>[   21.408303] [<c056748c>] (schedule+0x9c/0x6c4) from [<c0567d04>] 
(schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208)
<4>[   21.408319] [<c0567d04>] (schedule_timeout+0x1c/0x208) from 
[<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98)
<4>[   21.408337] [<c0568fac>] (__down+0x68/0x98) from [<c00d844c>] 
(down+0x2c/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408354] [<c00d844c>] (down+0x2c/0x3c) from [<c00bb23c>] 
(console_lock+0x38/0x60)
<4>[   21.408377] [<c00bb23c>] (console_lock+0x38/0x60) from 
[<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c)
<4>[   21.408394] [<c0564c80>] (console_cpu_notify+0x20/0x2c) from 
[<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70)
<4>[   21.408410] [<c00d8488>] (notifier_call_chain+0x2c/0x70) from 
[<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c)
<4>[   21.408425] [<c00bc318>] (__cpu_notify+0x24/0x3c) from 
[<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34)
<4>[   21.408444] [<c0552e7c>] (take_cpu_down+0x2c/0x34) from 
[<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c)
<4>[   21.408462] [<c00f34d4>] (stop_machine_cpu_stop+0xc0/0x11c) from 
[<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160)
<4>[   21.408482] [<c00f337c>] (cpu_stopper_thread+0xc8/0x160) from 
[<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
<4>[   21.408498] [<c00d30b0>] (kthread+0x80/0x88) from [<c004b6a0>] 
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum

             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-25 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-25 23:33 Michael Bohan [this message]
2011-04-25 23:33 ` console_cpu_notify can cause scheduling BUG during CPU hotplug Michael Bohan
2011-04-25 23:33 ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-26  0:18 ` Kevin Cernekee
2011-04-26  0:18   ` Kevin Cernekee
2011-04-26  5:58   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-26  5:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-26  5:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-04-26 21:06     ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-26 21:06       ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-27  7:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-27  7:38         ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-27 22:12         ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-27 22:12           ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-27 22:12           ` Michael Bohan
2011-04-30  8:38           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-30  8:38             ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-09 20:39             ` Michael Bohan
2011-05-09 20:39               ` Michael Bohan
2011-05-09 20:39               ` Michael Bohan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-30  8:37 Shen Canquan
2011-09-05  8:34 ` canquan.shen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB604C7.8090305@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mbohan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.orglethal \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.