From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: octlet AT payloads can be stack-allocated
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:05:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB6A6F0.3080604@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422151354.59c7ca77@stein>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> ...provided that the allocation persists until the packet was sent out
> to the bus. But we do not need slab allocations anymore in order to
> satisfy streaming DMA mapping constraints, thanks to commit da28947e7e36
> "firewire: ohci: avoid separate DMA mapping for small AT payloads".
>
> (Besides, the slab-allocated buffers that firewire-core, firewire-sbp2,
> and firedtv used to provide for 8-byte write and lock requests were
> still not fully portable since they crossed cacheline boundaries or
> shared a cacheline with unrelated CPU-accessed data. snd-firewire-lib
> got this aspect right by using an extra kmalloc/ kfree just for the
> 8-byte transaction buffer.)
>
> This change replaces kmalloc'ed lock transaction scratch buffers in
> firewire-core, firedtv, and snd-firewire-lib by local stack allocations.
> The lifetime requirement of these allocations is fulfilled because the
> call sites use the blocking fw_run_transaction API.
>
> Perhaps the most notable result of the change is simpler locking because
> there is no need to serialize usages of preallocated per-device buffers
> anymore. Also, allocations and deallocations are simpler.
>
> firewire-sbp2's struct sbp2_orb.pointer buffer for 8-byte block write
> requests on the other hand needs to remain slab-allocated in order to
> keep the allocation around until end of AT DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: octlet AT payloads can be stack-allocated
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:05:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB6A6F0.3080604@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422151354.59c7ca77@stein>
Stefan Richter wrote:
> ...provided that the allocation persists until the packet was sent out
> to the bus. But we do not need slab allocations anymore in order to
> satisfy streaming DMA mapping constraints, thanks to commit da28947e7e36
> "firewire: ohci: avoid separate DMA mapping for small AT payloads".
>
> (Besides, the slab-allocated buffers that firewire-core, firewire-sbp2,
> and firedtv used to provide for 8-byte write and lock requests were
> still not fully portable since they crossed cacheline boundaries or
> shared a cacheline with unrelated CPU-accessed data. snd-firewire-lib
> got this aspect right by using an extra kmalloc/ kfree just for the
> 8-byte transaction buffer.)
>
> This change replaces kmalloc'ed lock transaction scratch buffers in
> firewire-core, firedtv, and snd-firewire-lib by local stack allocations.
> The lifetime requirement of these allocations is fulfilled because the
> call sites use the blocking fw_run_transaction API.
>
> Perhaps the most notable result of the change is simpler locking because
> there is no need to serialize usages of preallocated per-device buffers
> anymore. Also, allocations and deallocations are simpler.
>
> firewire-sbp2's struct sbp2_orb.pointer buffer for 8-byte block write
> requests on the other hand needs to remain slab-allocated in order to
> keep the allocation around until end of AT DMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Acked-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4DA2B3DC.7010104@ladisch.de>
[not found] ` <4DA2B482.4060701@ladisch.de>
[not found] ` <20110411142651.638311e0@stein>
2011-04-22 13:13 ` [PATCH] firewire: octlet AT payloads can be stack-allocated Stefan Richter
2011-04-26 11:05 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2011-04-26 11:05 ` Clemens Ladisch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB6A6F0.3080604@ladisch.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.