All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: "Menon, Nishanth" <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
	Tim Nordell <tim.nordell@logicpd.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: gpmc-smsc911x: minor style fixes
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:40:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB6D974.6080201@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikw73F1RBmJC=+Z2msA3Wr7gG3AGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Nishanth,

On 04/26/11 16:45, Menon, Nishanth wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:50, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>> replace "printk(KERN_ERR" by "pr_err("
>> and fix needlessly multi-lined #ifdef
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c             |   14 +++++++-------
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h |    3 +--
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
>> index d30293a..b45efff 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
> minor suggestion: wont using pr_fmt help to reduce the need to add %s,
> __func__ for pr_err through out the file?

I don't understand of what "need" are you talking about.
I don't know of any need to add "%s, __func__" with pr_fmt...
I've added "%s, __func__" as a meter of choice.
IMO, it makes it easier to parse the dmesg output.
If anyone objects it, I can remove them,
but I think both pr_fmt and __func__ are nice here and
way better then "printk(KERN_*" with embedded "smsc911x".

>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        gpmc_cfg = board_data;
>>
>>        if (gpmc_cs_request(gpmc_cfg->cs, SZ_16M, &cs_mem_base) < 0) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPMC mem for smsc911x\n");
>> +               pr_err("%s: Failed to request GPMC mem region\n", __func__);
>>                return;
>>        }
>>
>> @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        gpmc_smsc911x_resources[0].end = cs_mem_base + 0xff;
>>
>>        if (gpio_request(gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq, "smsc911x irq") < 0) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x IRQ\n",
>> -                               gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq);
>> +               pr_err("%s: Failed to request IRQ GPIO%d\n", __func__,
>> +                      gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq);
>>                goto free1;
>>        }
>>
>> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        if (gpio_is_valid(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset)) {
>>                ret = gpio_request(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset, "smsc911x reset");
>>                if (ret) {
>> -                       printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x reset\n",
>> -                                       gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>> +                       pr_err("%s: Failed to request reset GPIO%d\n", __func__,
>> +                              gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>>                        goto free2;
>>                }
>>
>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>                 gpmc_smsc911x_resources, ARRAY_SIZE(gpmc_smsc911x_resources),
>>                 &gpmc_smsc911x_config, sizeof(gpmc_smsc911x_config));
>>        if (!pdev) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to register smsc911x device\n");
>> +               pr_err("%s: Unable to register platform device\n", __func__);
>>                gpio_free(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>>                goto free2;
>>        }
>> @@ -104,5 +104,5 @@ free2:
>>  free1:
>>        gpmc_cs_free(gpmc_cfg->cs);
>>
>> -       printk(KERN_ERR "Could not initialize smsc911x\n");
>> +       pr_err("Could not initialize smsc911x\n");
>>  }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> index d3f1579..ea6c9c8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data {
>>        u32     flags;
>>  };
>>
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || \
>> -       defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
>>
>>  extern void gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *d);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.3.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

-- 
Regards,
Igor.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: gpmc-smsc911x: minor style fixes
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:40:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB6D974.6080201@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikw73F1RBmJC=+Z2msA3Wr7gG3AGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Nishanth,

On 04/26/11 16:45, Menon, Nishanth wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:50, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>> replace "printk(KERN_ERR" by "pr_err("
>> and fix needlessly multi-lined #ifdef
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c             |   14 +++++++-------
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h |    3 +--
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
>> index d30293a..b45efff 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-smsc911x.c
> minor suggestion: wont using pr_fmt help to reduce the need to add %s,
> __func__ for pr_err through out the file?

I don't understand of what "need" are you talking about.
I don't know of any need to add "%s, __func__" with pr_fmt...
I've added "%s, __func__" as a meter of choice.
IMO, it makes it easier to parse the dmesg output.
If anyone objects it, I can remove them,
but I think both pr_fmt and __func__ are nice here and
way better then "printk(KERN_*" with embedded "smsc911x".

>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        gpmc_cfg = board_data;
>>
>>        if (gpmc_cs_request(gpmc_cfg->cs, SZ_16M, &cs_mem_base) < 0) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPMC mem for smsc911x\n");
>> +               pr_err("%s: Failed to request GPMC mem region\n", __func__);
>>                return;
>>        }
>>
>> @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        gpmc_smsc911x_resources[0].end = cs_mem_base + 0xff;
>>
>>        if (gpio_request(gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq, "smsc911x irq") < 0) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x IRQ\n",
>> -                               gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq);
>> +               pr_err("%s: Failed to request IRQ GPIO%d\n", __func__,
>> +                      gpmc_cfg->gpio_irq);
>>                goto free1;
>>        }
>>
>> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>        if (gpio_is_valid(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset)) {
>>                ret = gpio_request(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset, "smsc911x reset");
>>                if (ret) {
>> -                       printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smsc911x reset\n",
>> -                                       gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>> +                       pr_err("%s: Failed to request reset GPIO%d\n", __func__,
>> +                              gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>>                        goto free2;
>>                }
>>
>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void __init gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *board_data)
>>                 gpmc_smsc911x_resources, ARRAY_SIZE(gpmc_smsc911x_resources),
>>                 &gpmc_smsc911x_config, sizeof(gpmc_smsc911x_config));
>>        if (!pdev) {
>> -               printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to register smsc911x device\n");
>> +               pr_err("%s: Unable to register platform device\n", __func__);
>>                gpio_free(gpmc_cfg->gpio_reset);
>>                goto free2;
>>        }
>> @@ -104,5 +104,5 @@ free2:
>>  free1:
>>        gpmc_cs_free(gpmc_cfg->cs);
>>
>> -       printk(KERN_ERR "Could not initialize smsc911x\n");
>> +       pr_err("Could not initialize smsc911x\n");
>>  }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> index d3f1579..ea6c9c8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpmc-smsc911x.h
>> @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@ struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data {
>>        u32     flags;
>>  };
>>
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || \
>> -       defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
>>
>>  extern void gpmc_smsc911x_init(struct omap_smsc911x_platform_data *d);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.3.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>

-- 
Regards,
Igor.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-26 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-21 14:50 [PATCH 1/2] arm: omap: fix bug with multiple smsc911x devices Igor Grinberg
2011-04-21 14:50 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-21 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: omap: gpmc-smsc911x: minor style fixes Igor Grinberg
2011-04-21 14:50   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 13:45   ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-04-26 13:45     ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-04-26 14:40     ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2011-04-26 14:40       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 14:49       ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-04-26 14:49         ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-04-26 15:48         ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 15:48           ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 16:25           ` [PATCH v2 " Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 16:25             ` Igor Grinberg
2011-04-26 21:08             ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-04-26 21:08               ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-05-03  7:42               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-03  7:42                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-22 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: omap: fix bug with multiple smsc911x devices Mike Rapoport
2011-04-22 12:51   ` Mike Rapoport
2011-04-24  8:27   ` [PATCH v2 " Igor Grinberg
2011-04-24  8:27     ` Igor Grinberg
2011-05-03  6:27     ` Igor Grinberg
2011-05-03  6:27       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-05-03  7:37       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-03  7:37         ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB6D974.6080201@compulab.co.il \
    --to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=tim.nordell@logicpd.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.