All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Check PageUnevictable in lru_deactivate_fn
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:56:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBEC626.7060704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7a7b3ceafe4fdc4bc038774374504827c01481f.1304261567.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com>

On 05/01/2011 11:03 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> The lru_deactivate_fn should not move page which in on unevictable lru
> into inactive list. Otherwise, we can meet BUG when we use isolate_lru_pages
> as __isolate_lru_page could return -EINVAL.
> It's really BUG and let's fix it.
>
> Reported-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Tested-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Check PageUnevictable in lru_deactivate_fn
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:56:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBEC626.7060704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7a7b3ceafe4fdc4bc038774374504827c01481f.1304261567.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com>

On 05/01/2011 11:03 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> The lru_deactivate_fn should not move page which in on unevictable lru
> into inactive list. Otherwise, we can meet BUG when we use isolate_lru_pages
> as __isolate_lru_page could return -EINVAL.
> It's really BUG and let's fix it.
>
> Reported-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Tested-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-01 15:03 [PATCH 0/2] Fix an enhance deactive_page Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 15:03 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] Check PageUnevictable in lru_deactivate_fn Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 15:03   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 22:10   ` Ying Han
2011-05-01 22:10     ` Ying Han
2011-05-01 23:00     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 23:00       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-02 10:32   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:32     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 14:56   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2011-05-02 14:56     ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-01 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] Filter unevictable page out in deactivate_page Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 15:03   ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-02 10:37   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:37     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-03  0:29     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-03  0:29       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-02 14:57   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-02 14:57     ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-03  0:30     ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-03  0:30       ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DBEC626.7060704@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.