From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:58:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBFA78F.9060001@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303910411-15793-2-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Hi Akinobu,
On 27/04/11 23:20, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> m68knommu can't build ext4, udf, and ocfs2 due to the lack of
> find_next_bit_le().
>
> This implements find_next_bit_le() on m68knommu by duplicating the
> generic find_next_bit_le() in lib/find_next_bit.c.
Wouldn't the m68k specific implementation of this in
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h be better?
(bitops_*.h is still on my list of files to clean up and
merge for m68k mmu and non-mmu)
Regards
Greg
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita<akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>
> ---
>
> This patch should go into 2.6.39
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> index 7d3779f..97d1d0c 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,50 @@ found_middle:
> return result + ffz(__swab32(tmp));
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
> + long size, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + const unsigned long *p = addr;
> + unsigned long result = offset& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + if (offset>= size)
> + return size;
> + p += offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= result;
> + offset&= (BITS_PER_LONG - 1UL);
> + if (offset) {
> + tmp = __swab32(*(p++));
> + tmp&= (~0UL<< offset);
> + if (size< BITS_PER_LONG)
> + goto found_first;
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> +
> + while (size& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> + tmp = *(p++);
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle_swap;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> + if (!size)
> + return result;
> + tmp = __swab32(*p);
> +found_first:
> + tmp&= (~0UL>> (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> + if (tmp == 0UL) /* Are any bits set? */
> + return result + size; /* Nope. */
> +found_middle:
> + return result + __ffs(tmp);
> +
> +found_middle_swap:
> + return result + __ffs(__swab32(tmp));
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #include<asm-generic/bitops/fls.h>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:58:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBFA78F.9060001@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303910411-15793-2-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Hi Akinobu,
On 27/04/11 23:20, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> m68knommu can't build ext4, udf, and ocfs2 due to the lack of
> find_next_bit_le().
>
> This implements find_next_bit_le() on m68knommu by duplicating the
> generic find_next_bit_le() in lib/find_next_bit.c.
Wouldn't the m68k specific implementation of this in
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h be better?
(bitops_*.h is still on my list of files to clean up and
merge for m68k mmu and non-mmu)
Regards
Greg
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita<akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>
> ---
>
> This patch should go into 2.6.39
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> index 7d3779f..97d1d0c 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,50 @@ found_middle:
> return result + ffz(__swab32(tmp));
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
> + long size, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + const unsigned long *p = addr;
> + unsigned long result = offset& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + if (offset>= size)
> + return size;
> + p += offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= result;
> + offset&= (BITS_PER_LONG - 1UL);
> + if (offset) {
> + tmp = __swab32(*(p++));
> + tmp&= (~0UL<< offset);
> + if (size< BITS_PER_LONG)
> + goto found_first;
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> +
> + while (size& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> + tmp = *(p++);
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle_swap;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> + if (!size)
> + return result;
> + tmp = __swab32(*p);
> +found_first:
> + tmp&= (~0UL>> (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> + if (tmp == 0UL) /* Are any bits set? */
> + return result + size; /* Nope. */
> +found_middle:
> + return result + __ffs(tmp);
> +
> +found_middle_swap:
> + return result + __ffs(__swab32(tmp));
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #include<asm-generic/bitops/fls.h>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 13:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 6:58 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2011-05-03 6:58 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-05-03 9:11 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arch: add #define for each of optimized find bitops Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 14:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] bitops: add #ifndef for each of " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arch: remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] s390: " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] m68knommu: use generic find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBFA78F.9060001@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.