* KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 10:21 ` Juan Quintela
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2011-05-03 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Later, Juan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 10:21 ` Juan Quintela
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2011-05-03 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Later, Juan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for May 03rd
2011-05-03 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
@ 2011-05-03 13:04 ` Jan Kiszka
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2011-05-03 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
Provided there will be more topics:
- import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 13:04 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2011-05-03 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: quintela; +Cc: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
Provided there will be more topics:
- import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
2011-05-03 13:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
@ 2011-05-03 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2011-05-03 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: quintela, qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
On 05/03/2011 08:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> Provided there will be more topics:
> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
This has come up a few times in the past.
The opposition tends to be that it would make feature development harder
because you couldn't easily point QEMU at a different set of kernel headers.
These days, so few things change in the KVM interface though that maybe
it's not the end of the world.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
>
> Jan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2011-05-03 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list, quintela
On 05/03/2011 08:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> Provided there will be more topics:
> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
This has come up a few times in the past.
The opposition tends to be that it would make feature development harder
because you couldn't easily point QEMU at a different set of kernel headers.
These days, so few things change in the KVM interface though that maybe
it's not the end of the world.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
>
> Jan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
2011-05-03 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
@ 2011-05-03 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2011-05-03 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
KVM devel mailing list
On 2011-05-03 15:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 08:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>
>> Provided there will be more topics:
>> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
>
> This has come up a few times in the past.
>
> The opposition tends to be that it would make feature development harder
> because you couldn't easily point QEMU at a different set of kernel headers.
There should be no need to worry, even if for those bits that will
continue to change more frequently. I've included a hopefully easy to
use update mechanism.
>
> These days, so few things change in the KVM interface though that maybe
> it's not the end of the world.
PowerPC and future KVM arch will go through the same changes that x86
should be through now. So I would prefer to avoid the mistakes we made
for the latter.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2011-05-03 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, KVM devel mailing list,
quintela@redhat.com
On 2011-05-03 15:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 08:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>
>> Provided there will be more topics:
>> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
>
> This has come up a few times in the past.
>
> The opposition tends to be that it would make feature development harder
> because you couldn't easily point QEMU at a different set of kernel headers.
There should be no need to worry, even if for those bits that will
continue to change more frequently. I've included a hopefully easy to
use update mechanism.
>
> These days, so few things change in the KVM interface though that maybe
> it's not the end of the world.
PowerPC and future KVM arch will go through the same changes that x86
should be through now. So I would prefer to avoid the mistakes we made
for the latter.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
2011-05-03 13:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
@ 2011-05-03 14:02 ` Jes Sorensen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2011-05-03 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: quintela, qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list
On 05/03/11 15:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> Provided there will be more topics:
> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
>
> Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
Since this it the only topic for the call, I suggest we cancel and add
it to next week's agenda.
Cheers,
Jes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for May 03rd
@ 2011-05-03 14:02 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2011-05-03 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: qemu-devel, KVM devel mailing list, quintela
On 05/03/11 15:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 12:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>
> Provided there will be more topics:
> - import kvm headers into qemu, drop #ifdef maze
>
> Otherwise, we can also discuss this based on the patch I'm preparing ATM.
Since this it the only topic for the call, I suggest we cancel and add
it to next week's agenda.
Cheers,
Jes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-03 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-03 10:21 KVM call agenda for May 03rd Juan Quintela
2011-05-03 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2011-05-03 13:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-05-03 13:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-05-03 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-03 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-03 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-05-03 14:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-05-03 14:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-05-03 14:02 ` Jes Sorensen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.