* What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
@ 2011-06-08 18:41 Ben Greear
2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Greear @ 2011-06-08 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs
What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
for possible upstream acceptance?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
2011-06-08 18:41 What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Ben Greear
@ 2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees
2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jim Rees @ 2011-06-08 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: linux-nfs
Ben Greear wrote:
What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
for possible upstream acceptance?
I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate.
Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these
questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees
@ 2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-06-08 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Rees; +Cc: Ben Greear, linux-nfs
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>
> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
> for possible upstream acceptance?
>
> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate.
>
> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these
> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
>
> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.
I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
some day.
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
@ 2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson
2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Weston Andros Adamson @ 2011-06-08 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: Jim Rees, Ben Greear, linux-nfs
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
>> Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
>> for possible upstream acceptance?
>>
>> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
>> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate.
>>
>> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these
>> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
>>
>> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>
> It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.
>
> I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
> some day.
I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org. I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation).
-dros
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson
@ 2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2011-06-08 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Weston Andros Adamson; +Cc: Jim Rees, Ben Greear, linux-nfs
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:49:38PM -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> >> Ben Greear wrote:
> >>
> >> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
> >> for possible upstream acceptance?
> >>
> >> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
> >> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate.
> >>
> >> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these
> >> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
> >>
> >> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> >
> > It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.
> >
> > I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
> > some day.
>
> I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org. I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation).
OK, good!
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-08 20:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-08 18:41 What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Ben Greear
2011-06-08 18:52 ` Jim Rees
2011-06-08 19:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-06-08 19:49 ` Weston Andros Adamson
2011-06-08 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.