From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Pa
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org>
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> matrix for no good reason.
>
I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>Pa
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org>
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> matrix for no good reason.
>
I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org>
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> matrix for no good reason.
>
I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org>
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> matrix for no good reason.
>
I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614223404.GA30057@linux-mips.org>
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
> used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
> matrix for no good reason.
>
I see... that's why a bunch of devices that only exist on ARM and MIPS
SoCs are offered on x86 platforms?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 19:08 [RFC,PATCH] Cleanup PC parallel port Kconfig Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 19:08 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 19:08 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 19:08 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 19:08 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 20:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 8:02 ` Lennox Wu
2011-06-15 8:02 ` Lennox Wu
2011-06-15 8:02 ` Lennox Wu
2011-06-15 8:02 ` Lennox Wu
2011-06-14 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-14 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-14 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-14 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-14 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 4:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-15 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-15 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 22:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 22:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 22:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-14 22:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-06-15 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 4:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 4:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 4:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 4:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 5:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 5:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 5:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 5:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 5:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 8:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 8:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 8:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 8:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 8:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-06-15 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-15 14:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-14 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-14 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-14 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-14 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-14 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-14 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-15 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 7:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 7:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-15 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-15 1:24 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-06-15 1:24 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-06-15 1:24 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-06-15 1:24 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-06-15 1:24 ` Guan Xuetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF8329C.7000904@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.