All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is File net/TUNABLE in kernel source still useful?
@ 2011-06-24  7:06 Shan Wei
  2011-06-24  7:39 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shan Wei @ 2011-06-24  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller, netdev, 单卫

Hi David,

 File net/TUNABLE has never be updated since git age.
 For some tunable parameters which user can control with proc file-system,
 They are all in ip-sysctl.txt doc.
 But for tunable parameters that only at compile time,
 Do we really need this document to maintain them?

 So many ones and seems no meaning.
 Directly send a patch to kill it, OK?

-- 
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Is File net/TUNABLE in kernel source still useful?
  2011-06-24  7:06 Is File net/TUNABLE in kernel source still useful? Shan Wei
@ 2011-06-24  7:39 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-06-24  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shanwei; +Cc: netdev

From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:06:23 +0800

>  So many ones and seems no meaning.
>  Directly send a patch to kill it, OK?

Sure.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-24  7:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-24  7:06 Is File net/TUNABLE in kernel source still useful? Shan Wei
2011-06-24  7:39 ` David Miller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.