From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iwlwifi: use pci_dev->revision, again
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:37:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E04A143.1090204@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308924515.19001.2.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
Hello.
wwguy wrote:
>>>> Commit ff938e43d39e926de74b32a3656c190f979ab642 (net: use pci_dev->revision,
>>>> again) already converted this driver to using the 'revision' field of 'struct
>>>> pci_dev' but commit c2974a1d18832a9fffb2eb389c3878f5c4ed92f1 (iwlagn: remove
>>>> rev_id) later reverted that change for no reason. Now restore the change...
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov<sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> The patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c | 5 ++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> @@ -3275,10 +3275,9 @@ struct ieee80211_ops iwlagn_hw_ops = {
>>>>
>>>> static u32 iwl_hw_detect(struct iwl_priv *priv)
>>>> {
>>>> - u8 rev_id;
>>>> + IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "HW Revision ID = 0x%X\n",
>>>> + priv->pci_dev->revision);
>>>>
>>>> - pci_read_config_byte(priv->pci_dev, PCI_REVISION_ID,&rev_id);
>>>> - IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "HW Revision ID = 0x%X\n", rev_id);
>>>> return iwl_read32(priv, CSR_HW_REV);
>>>> }
>>> hmm, I believe it is merge sequence issue, the IWL_DEBUG_INFO line has
>>> benn remove all together in later patch. the information is being log in
>>> the calling function, no need to log in "iwl_hw_detect"
>> Hm, you probably mean this patch in the iwlwifi-2.6.git (of which I wasn't
>> aware):
>> author Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
>> Tue, 31 May 2011 06:58:18 +0000 (09:58 +0300)
>> committer Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
>> Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:18:01 +0000 (08:18 -0700)
>> commit 85aed7c48113dfcdc913008481c46346af0db69e
>> tree 75831a2ec540039470c295a81c2059a24a4531f5
>> parent 19707bac16129ccebc398dbff9d2b44b17b24fea
>> iwlagn: don't read the PCI_REVISION_ID from iwl-agn.c
>> The PCI_REVISION_ID is read and printed in iwl_pci_probe anyway using pr_info
>> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
>> Since iwl_pci_probe() still reads the PCI config. register, my patch
>> should be recast to modify iwl-pci.c instead...
> I don't believe this patch is needed since the "log" statement is move
> to outside the function.
That's what I'm talking about -- it's not needed in its current form, but I
will redo the patch to modify iwl-pci,c where iwl_pci_probe() still reads
PCI_REVISION_ID.
> Thanks
> Wey
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov-Igf4POYTYCDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org"
<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"ilw-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org"
<ilw-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iwlwifi: use pci_dev->revision, again
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:37:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E04A143.1090204@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308924515.19001.2.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
Hello.
wwguy wrote:
>>>> Commit ff938e43d39e926de74b32a3656c190f979ab642 (net: use pci_dev->revision,
>>>> again) already converted this driver to using the 'revision' field of 'struct
>>>> pci_dev' but commit c2974a1d18832a9fffb2eb389c3878f5c4ed92f1 (iwlagn: remove
>>>> rev_id) later reverted that change for no reason. Now restore the change...
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov<sshtylyov-hkdhdckH98+B+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> The patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c | 5 ++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn.c
>>>> @@ -3275,10 +3275,9 @@ struct ieee80211_ops iwlagn_hw_ops = {
>>>>
>>>> static u32 iwl_hw_detect(struct iwl_priv *priv)
>>>> {
>>>> - u8 rev_id;
>>>> + IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "HW Revision ID = 0x%X\n",
>>>> + priv->pci_dev->revision);
>>>>
>>>> - pci_read_config_byte(priv->pci_dev, PCI_REVISION_ID,&rev_id);
>>>> - IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "HW Revision ID = 0x%X\n", rev_id);
>>>> return iwl_read32(priv, CSR_HW_REV);
>>>> }
>>> hmm, I believe it is merge sequence issue, the IWL_DEBUG_INFO line has
>>> benn remove all together in later patch. the information is being log in
>>> the calling function, no need to log in "iwl_hw_detect"
>> Hm, you probably mean this patch in the iwlwifi-2.6.git (of which I wasn't
>> aware):
>> author Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Tue, 31 May 2011 06:58:18 +0000 (09:58 +0300)
>> committer Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:18:01 +0000 (08:18 -0700)
>> commit 85aed7c48113dfcdc913008481c46346af0db69e
>> tree 75831a2ec540039470c295a81c2059a24a4531f5
>> parent 19707bac16129ccebc398dbff9d2b44b17b24fea
>> iwlagn: don't read the PCI_REVISION_ID from iwl-agn.c
>> The PCI_REVISION_ID is read and printed in iwl_pci_probe anyway using pr_info
>> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Since iwl_pci_probe() still reads the PCI config. register, my patch
>> should be recast to modify iwl-pci.c instead...
> I don't believe this patch is needed since the "log" statement is move
> to outside the function.
That's what I'm talking about -- it's not needed in its current form, but I
will redo the patch to modify iwl-pci,c where iwl_pci_probe() still reads
PCI_REVISION_ID.
> Thanks
> Wey
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-23 14:41 [PATCH 1/2] iwlwifi: use pci_dev->revision, again Sergei Shtylyov
2011-06-23 14:41 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-06-23 15:02 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-06-24 10:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-06-24 10:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-06-24 14:08 ` wwguy
2011-06-24 14:08 ` wwguy
2011-06-24 14:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2011-06-24 14:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-06-24 15:21 ` wwguy
2011-06-24 15:21 ` wwguy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E04A143.1090204@mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.