All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
To: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, hvoigt@hvoigt.net,
	jens.lehmann@web.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] Don't push a repository with unpushed submodules
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:06:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0A506B.6040407@xiplink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309112987-3185-3-git-send-email-iveqy@iveqy.com>

On 11-06-26 02:29 PM, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a submodule
> to the server but pushing a super-project that contains a commit for
> that submodule. The result is that the superproject points at a
> submodule commit that is not avaliable on the server.
> 
> Check that all submodule commits that are about to be pushed are present
> on a remote of the submodule and require forcing if that is not the
> case.

I have a few concerns about what this is trying to do.

First, I expect performance will be terrible in repositories with large
and/or many submodules.  I'd go so far as to say that it's pretty much a
show-stopper for our repository.

Second, there are many times where I'm working in a submodule on branch
"TopicA" but not in branch "TopicB".  If I've made submodule changes in
TopicA then try to push up TopicB, won't I have have to tell push to "-f"?
But that turns off other checks that I'd rather keep.

I'd feel a lot better about this patch if the check was *off* by default and
there was a config setting / command-line option to turn it on.

I also agree with Junio that this kind of verification makes more sense in a
hook on the server side.

		M.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-28 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-26 18:29 [RFC 0/2] push checks for unpushed remotes in submodules Fredrik Gustafsson
2011-06-26 18:29 ` [RFC 1/2] test whether " Fredrik Gustafsson
2011-06-26 18:29 ` [RFC 2/2] Don't push a repository with unpushed submodules Fredrik Gustafsson
2011-06-28 18:29   ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-28 19:30     ` Heiko Voigt
2011-06-28 20:43       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-06-28 21:59         ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2011-06-28 22:24         ` Jens Lehmann
2011-07-04 20:05         ` Heiko Voigt
2011-06-28 22:06   ` Marc Branchaud [this message]
2011-06-28 22:32     ` Jens Lehmann
2011-06-29 17:29       ` Marc Branchaud
2011-06-28 23:02     ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2011-06-29 17:34       ` Marc Branchaud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0A506B.6040407@xiplink.com \
    --to=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    --cc=iveqy@iveqy.com \
    --cc=jens.lehmann@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.