Re: [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

On 06/29/2011 08:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 02:59 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we have touched this topic before during some IRC discussions or
>> somewhere deep in a mailing list thread, but I think it hasn't been
>> discussed on the list.
>>
>> Our default cache mode of cache=writethrough is extremely conservative
>> and provides absolute safety at the cost of performance, and most people
>> don't use it if they know that it can be changed because it just
>> performs too bad. There are use cases where you need it (broken guest
>> OS), but none and writeback are just as correct with respect to the
>> specs and they are safe to use with current OSes. And even with broken
>> OSes, in many use cases it doesn't really matter if you lose a VM and
>> have to reinstall it (which is probably true even more for users
>> invoking qemu directly instead of using libvirt).
>>
>> I think the motivation to switch from writeback to writethrough as
>> default was that writeback was entirely unsafe back then. This isn't
>> true any more, so is there still enough reason to have the slow
>> writethrough mode as default?
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure if I should suggest writeback or none as the new
>> default, but I think it could make sense to change it.
>
> So long as -M old retains the old behaviour, I'm in favour.

wce needs to be preserved but cache wouldn't need to be AFAICT.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> I think writeback is probably a better default than none.
>