From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0B63B5.5070404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629163825.GE17590@quack.suse.cz>
On 06/29/2011 12:38 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 28-06-11 11:35:10, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
>> in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
>> the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some
>> file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
>> ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
>> sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
>> individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
> ...
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> index 1921392..fa44df8 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ extern int ext4_htree_store_dirent(struct file *dir_file, __u32 hash,
>> extern void ext4_htree_free_dir_info(struct dir_private_info *p);
>>
>> /* fsync.c */
>> -extern int ext4_sync_file(struct file *, int);
>> +extern int ext4_sync_file(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
>> extern int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *);
>>
>> /* hash.c */
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
>> index ce66d2f..afab2e4 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
>> * i_mutex lock is held when entering and exiting this function
>> */
>>
>> -int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, int datasync)
>> +int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>> struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
>> @@ -178,15 +178,22 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, int datasync)
>>
>> trace_ext4_sync_file_enter(file, datasync);
>>
>> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>> +
>> if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
>> - return 0;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> ret = ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto out;
>>
>> if (!journal) {
>> - ret = generic_file_fsync(file, datasync);
>> + if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY ||
>> + (datasync && (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)))
>> + ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
> Umm, how did you get to this change? It is actually wrong - ext4 in
> nojournal mode really seems to need to call generic_file_fsync() (so that
> sync_buffers_list() is called).
>
Ah oops sorry about that, I will fix that, I was trying to be clever and
encapsulate generic_file_fsync()'s behavior into here but I missed the
sync_mapping_buffers() call. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-28 15:35 [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 16:38 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-29 17:41 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2011-06-29 17:05 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-06-29 17:05 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-07-04 8:54 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-07-19 10:24 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-29 18:05 Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 18:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 18:14 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 19:26 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-23 18:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 18:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 19:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 19:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 20:26 ` Josef Bacik
2011-07-23 20:26 ` Josef Bacik
2011-07-23 20:38 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 20:38 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 22:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 22:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-24 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 17:38 ` Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0B63B5.5070404@redhat.com \
--to=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.