From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report/annotate: Add option to specify a CPU range
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:07:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0B69EC.70009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629150739.49b25604@kryten>
On 06/28/2011 11:07 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Add an option to perf report and perf annotate to specify which CPUs
What about perf-script?
> to operate on. This enables us to take a single system wide profile
> and analyse each CPU (or group of CPUs) in isolation.
>
> This was useful when profiling a multiprocess workload where the
> bottleneck was on one CPU but this was hidden in the overall profile.
> Per process and per thread breakdowns didn't help because multiple
> processes were running on each CPU and no single process consumed
> an entire CPU.
>
> The patch converts the list of CPUs returned by cpu_map__new into a
> bitmap for fast lookup. I wanted to use -C to be consistent with perf
> top/record/stat, but unfortunately perf report already uses -C <comms>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> ---
>
> I capped it at MAX_NR_CPUS to avoid having to dynamically allocate
> cpu_bitmap, but we could do that if the extra complexity is worth it.
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/tools/perf/builtin-report.c 2011-06-29 09:01:46.209676867 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/tools/perf/builtin-report.c 2011-06-29 14:53:26.131226181 +1000
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
> #include "util/sort.h"
> #include "util/hist.h"
>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include "util/cpumap.h"
> +
> static char const *input_name = "perf.data";
>
> static bool force, use_tui, use_stdio;
> @@ -48,6 +51,9 @@ static const char *pretty_printing_style
> static char callchain_default_opt[] = "fractal,0.5";
> static symbol_filter_t annotate_init;
>
> +static const char *cpu_list;
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
> +
> static int perf_session__add_hist_entry(struct perf_session *session,
> struct addr_location *al,
> struct perf_sample *sample,
> @@ -116,6 +122,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(union pe
> if (al.filtered || (hide_unresolved && al.sym == NULL))
> return 0;
>
> + if (cpu_list && !test_bit(sample->cpu, cpu_bitmap))
> + return 0;
> +
Need to check that the SAMPLE_CPU attribute is set for the event for
which the sample is generated; see builtin-script.c,
perf_evsel__check_attr().
> if (al.map != NULL)
> al.map->dso->hit = 1;
>
> @@ -455,6 +464,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
> "Only display entries resolved to a symbol"),
> OPT_STRING(0, "symfs", &symbol_conf.symfs, "directory",
> "Look for files with symbols relative to this directory"),
> + OPT_STRING('c', "cpu", &cpu_list, "cpu", "list of cpus to profile"),
This option should be added to the Documentation file,
Documentation/perf-report.txt
Same comments for perf-annotate changes below.
David
> OPT_END()
> };
>
> @@ -501,6 +511,23 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **ar
>
> setup_sorting(report_usage, options);
>
> + if (cpu_list) {
> + int i;
> + struct cpu_map *map = cpu_map__new(cpu_list);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + int cpu = map->map[i];
> +
> + if (cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Requested CPU %d too large, "
> + "consider raising MAX_NR_CPUS\n", cpu);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + set_bit(cpu, cpu_bitmap);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (parent_pattern != default_parent_pattern) {
> if (sort_dimension__add("parent") < 0)
> return -1;
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c 2011-06-29 09:01:46.199676692 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c 2011-06-29 09:01:56.519857004 +1000
> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> #include "util/hist.h"
> #include "util/session.h"
>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include "util/cpumap.h"
> +
> static char const *input_name = "perf.data";
>
> static bool force, use_tui, use_stdio;
> @@ -38,6 +41,9 @@ static bool print_line;
>
> static const char *sym_hist_filter;
>
> +static const char *cpu_list;
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
> +
> static int perf_evlist__add_sample(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> @@ -90,6 +96,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(union pe
> return -1;
> }
>
> + if (cpu_list && !test_bit(sample->cpu, cpu_bitmap))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!al.filtered &&
> perf_evlist__add_sample(session->evlist, sample, evsel, &al)) {
> pr_warning("problem incrementing symbol count, "
> @@ -252,6 +261,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
> "print matching source lines (may be slow)"),
> OPT_BOOLEAN('P', "full-paths", &full_paths,
> "Don't shorten the displayed pathnames"),
> + OPT_STRING('c', "cpu", &cpu_list, "cpu", "list of cpus to profile"),
> OPT_END()
> };
>
> @@ -274,6 +284,23 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **
>
> setup_sorting(annotate_usage, options);
>
> + if (cpu_list) {
> + int i;
> + struct cpu_map *map = cpu_map__new(cpu_list);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + int cpu = map->map[i];
> +
> + if (cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Requested CPU %d too large, "
> + "consider raising MAX_NR_CPUS\n", cpu);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + set_bit(cpu, cpu_bitmap);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (argc) {
> /*
> * Special case: if there's an argument left then assume tha
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 5:07 [PATCH] perf report/annotate: Add option to specify a CPU range Anton Blanchard
2011-06-29 18:07 ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-06-30 3:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-06-30 3:16 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-06-30 3:56 ` David Ahern
2011-07-01 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-04 11:51 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-04 11:57 ` [PATCH] perf report/annotate/script: " Anton Blanchard
2011-07-05 12:56 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0B69EC.70009@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.