From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Jan Weitzel <j.weitzel@phytec.de>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
tony@atomide.com, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap4: rename gpmc clock to gpmc_ick
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:42:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E135B07.80801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oc18r2y3.fsf@ti.com>
On 7/5/2011 11:35 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
>
>> + Benoit
>>
>> On 7/5/2011 5:19 AM, Jan Weitzel wrote:
>>> The gpmc clock on omap44xx is called gpmc_ick not gpmc_ck in
>>> clock44xx_data.c
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Weitzel<j.weitzel@phytec.de>
>> This happened after renaming the clock-nodes some time back.
>> Looks good to me as a fix though in long run GPMC should be
>> moved to hwmod to avoid such naming issues
>
> In fact, Benoit has already done it[1] as part of his last series:
> [PATCH v2 0/4] OMAP4: Add modulemode support to hwmod framework (part 2)
>
Ohh yes. I remember now about the discussion with him on the GPMC patch
which he did as a followup patch to mine similar clock framework
patch [1]
Thanks for the link.
Regards
Santosh
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/937422/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap4: rename gpmc clock to gpmc_ick
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:42:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E135B07.80801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oc18r2y3.fsf@ti.com>
On 7/5/2011 11:35 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
>
>> + Benoit
>>
>> On 7/5/2011 5:19 AM, Jan Weitzel wrote:
>>> The gpmc clock on omap44xx is called gpmc_ick not gpmc_ck in
>>> clock44xx_data.c
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Weitzel<j.weitzel@phytec.de>
>> This happened after renaming the clock-nodes some time back.
>> Looks good to me as a fix though in long run GPMC should be
>> moved to hwmod to avoid such naming issues
>
> In fact, Benoit has already done it[1] as part of his last series:
> [PATCH v2 0/4] OMAP4: Add modulemode support to hwmod framework (part 2)
>
Ohh yes. I remember now about the discussion with him on the GPMC patch
which he did as a followup patch to mine similar clock framework
patch [1]
Thanks for the link.
Regards
Santosh
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/937422/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-05 12:19 [PATCH] ARM: omap4: rename gpmc clock to gpmc_ick Jan Weitzel
2011-07-05 12:19 ` Jan Weitzel
2011-07-05 16:49 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-07-05 16:49 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-07-05 18:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-05 18:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-05 18:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-07-05 18:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E135B07.80801@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=j.weitzel@phytec.de \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.