All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: aelder@sgi.com
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Add Generic FS Punch Hole Test 255
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1E1E41.30106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310574716.1998.25.camel@doink>

On 07/13/2011 09:31 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:24 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
>> This patch adds a new test 255 that tests fallocate punch hole,
>> but is for use by generic filesystems.  It is similar to 252,
>> but uses a weaker fiemap filter that only displays the location
>> of the hole, and not the extent types.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I realize Christoph already committed this but I
> spotted something so I thought I might as well
> mention it.  I haven't tested any of this, so
> it may be OK after all, but if it's not then
> the filter_hole_fiemap() function ought to be
> updated.
>
> 					-Alex
>
> . . .
>
>> diff --git a/common.punch b/common.punch
>> index c18f88a..a48b7ae 100644
>> --- a/common.punch
>> +++ b/common.punch
>> @@ -218,6 +218,23 @@ _filter_fiemap()
>>   	_coalesce_extents
>>   }
>>
>> +# Filters fiemap output to only print the
>> +# file offset column and whether or not
>> +# it is an extent or a hole
>> +_filter_hole_fiemap()
>> +{
>> +	awk --posix '
>> +		$3 ~ /hole/ {
>> +			print $1, $2, $3;
>> +			next;
>> +		}
>> +		$5 ~ /0x[[:digit:]]+/ {
>
> I believe this should be:
>                   $5 ~ /0x[[:xdigit:]]+/ {
>
> (I.e., hex digits, not just decimals.)
>

Hi Alex,

I think you are right.  The extent flags are printed in hex, so it 
should be xdigit.  The existing _filter_fiemap routine that I modeled 
this code from is also only parsing decimal digits.  Even though the 
tests are not showing any problems right now, it should probably be 
fixed.  Should I submit a patch to correct it?

Allison Henderson

>> +			print $1, $2, "extent";
>> +		}' |
>> +	_coalesce_extents
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>>   # Prints the md5 checksum of a given file
>>   _md5_checksum()
>>   {
>
> . . .
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: aelder@sgi.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Add Generic FS Punch Hole Test 255
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E1E1E41.30106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310574716.1998.25.camel@doink>

On 07/13/2011 09:31 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:24 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
>> This patch adds a new test 255 that tests fallocate punch hole,
>> but is for use by generic filesystems.  It is similar to 252,
>> but uses a weaker fiemap filter that only displays the location
>> of the hole, and not the extent types.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I realize Christoph already committed this but I
> spotted something so I thought I might as well
> mention it.  I haven't tested any of this, so
> it may be OK after all, but if it's not then
> the filter_hole_fiemap() function ought to be
> updated.
>
> 					-Alex
>
> . . .
>
>> diff --git a/common.punch b/common.punch
>> index c18f88a..a48b7ae 100644
>> --- a/common.punch
>> +++ b/common.punch
>> @@ -218,6 +218,23 @@ _filter_fiemap()
>>   	_coalesce_extents
>>   }
>>
>> +# Filters fiemap output to only print the
>> +# file offset column and whether or not
>> +# it is an extent or a hole
>> +_filter_hole_fiemap()
>> +{
>> +	awk --posix '
>> +		$3 ~ /hole/ {
>> +			print $1, $2, $3;
>> +			next;
>> +		}
>> +		$5 ~ /0x[[:digit:]]+/ {
>
> I believe this should be:
>                   $5 ~ /0x[[:xdigit:]]+/ {
>
> (I.e., hex digits, not just decimals.)
>

Hi Alex,

I think you are right.  The extent flags are printed in hex, so it 
should be xdigit.  The existing _filter_fiemap routine that I modeled 
this code from is also only parsing decimal digits.  Even though the 
tests are not showing any problems right now, it should probably be 
fixed.  Should I submit a patch to correct it?

Allison Henderson

>> +			print $1, $2, "extent";
>> +		}' |
>> +	_coalesce_extents
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>>   # Prints the md5 checksum of a given file
>>   _md5_checksum()
>>   {
>
> . . .
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-13 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30  5:23 [PATCH 0/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 failure Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:23 ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Make 252 xfs only with MD5 checksum Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:23   ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 252 Golden Output Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:23   ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:24 ` [PATCH 3/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Update 242 " Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:24   ` Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:24 ` [PATCH 4/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Add Generic FS Punch Hole Test 255 Allison Henderson
2011-06-30  5:24   ` Allison Henderson
2011-07-13 16:31   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-13 16:31     ` Alex Elder
2011-07-13 22:37     ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2011-07-13 22:37       ` Allison Henderson
2011-07-14 14:37       ` Alex Elder
2011-07-14 14:37         ` Alex Elder
2011-07-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 failure Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-13 12:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-13 22:25   ` Allison Henderson
2011-07-13 22:25     ` Allison Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E1E1E41.30106@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.