sudo build failure

sudo build failure

[Kumar Gala]

Trying to build a powerpc64 target rootfs and I'm getting the following build failures on sudo.  Wondering if anyone has seen anything similar:

http://pastebin.com/MeqPn46Q

- k

Re: sudo build failure

[Phil Blundell]

On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 07:16 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Trying to build a powerpc64 target rootfs and I'm getting the following build failures on sudo.  Wondering if anyone has seen anything similar:
> 
> http://pastebin.com/MeqPn46Q

There was a bug like that a few months ago which was caused by broken
siteinfo files.  Presumably your tree is fairly up to date, but it
sounds like you have a similar kind of issue.  You'll need to
investigate why configure thinks you don't need -ldl.

p.

Re: sudo build failure

[Tom Rini]

On 07/20/2011 05:42 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 07:16 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Trying to build a powerpc64 target rootfs and I'm getting the following build failures on sudo.  Wondering if anyone has seen anything similar:
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/MeqPn46Q
> 
> There was a bug like that a few months ago which was caused by broken
> siteinfo files.  Presumably your tree is fairly up to date, but it
> sounds like you have a similar kind of issue.  You'll need to
> investigate why configure thinks you don't need -ldl.

And part of the problem, I suspect, is that we're still re-syncing
siteinfo stuff from oe.dev (where your file is based on) into oe-core
and oe.dev has a lot more stuff in common files (which I'm working on
bringing to oe-core right now).

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: sudo build failure

[Kumar Gala]

On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Tom Rini wrote:

> On 07/20/2011 05:42 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 07:16 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> Trying to build a powerpc64 target rootfs and I'm getting the following build failures on sudo.  Wondering if anyone has seen anything similar:
>>> 
>>> http://pastebin.com/MeqPn46Q
>> 
>> There was a bug like that a few months ago which was caused by broken
>> siteinfo files.  Presumably your tree is fairly up to date, but it
>> sounds like you have a similar kind of issue.  You'll need to
>> investigate why configure thinks you don't need -ldl.
> 
> And part of the problem, I suspect, is that we're still re-syncing
> siteinfo stuff from oe.dev (where your file is based on) into oe-core
> and oe.dev has a lot more stuff in common files (which I'm working on
> bringing to oe-core right now).

Yeah, this I was able to fix the powerpc64-linux siteinfo file I was using that had:

ac_cv_func_dlopen=${ac_cv_func_dlopen=yes}

Caused us not to have -ldl

- k