From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: GMA500: ERROR: "__bad_udelay" undefined!
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:28:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2CC6CC.5020204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2CC55B.5010307@gmail.com>
On 25/07/11 11:22, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 25/07/11 07:37, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> Just got this when building the attached .config on x86_64 with gcc
>> 4.6.1
>> on up-to-date mainline git tree (head at
>> b6844e8f64920cdee620157252169ba63afb0c89) :
>>
>> ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gfx.ko] undefined!
>> make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>>
>> I don't need gma500, so I've just disabled the driver to get around
>> it but
>> I thought some people might still like to know :)
>>
> __bad_udelay is a compile time check that constant udelays do not
> exceed a certain threshold. For x86_64 it used to be n > 20000, now it
> is n / 20000 >= 1. The problem is in
> drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c:psb_init_wait_for_vblank,
> which does udelay(20000) which under the old code would have been
> fine, but fails the new __bad_udelay check.
>
> Possibly the udelay can just be converted to an mdelay?
Here is the patch:
----
A change to the constraints for the compile time check for __bad_udelay
on some architectures caused breakage in the gma500 staging driver. Fix
by replacing udelay with mdelay.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c b/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
index 4f47d09..09e378d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gma500/psb_intel_display.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static bool psb_intel_find_best_PLL(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int target,
void psb_intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_device *dev)
{
/* Wait for 20ms, i.e. one cycle at 50hz. */
- udelay(20000);
+ mdelay(20);
}
int psb_intel_pipe_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-24 21:37 GMA500: ERROR: "__bad_udelay" undefined! Jesper Juhl
2011-07-25 1:22 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-07-25 1:28 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2011-07-25 2:15 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-25 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-25 21:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-07-26 9:06 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2011-07-26 10:19 ` Alan Cox
2011-07-26 14:07 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2011-07-26 15:07 ` Alan Cox
2011-08-01 1:54 ` Patrik Jakobsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2CC6CC.5020204@gmail.com \
--to=rmallon@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.