From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] scsi-disk: Check for supported commands
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:46:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2EC54C.5090208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311346277-32329-7-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
Am 22.07.2011 16:51, schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> Not every command is support for any device type. This patch adds
> a check for rejecting unsupported commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
We do emulate SEEK (6), but it's not in your scsi_cmd_table at all.
> ---
> hw/scsi-disk.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> index ae2c157..8ad90c0 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> @@ -361,13 +361,107 @@ static int scsi_get_sense(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *outbuf, int len)
> return scsi_build_sense(s->sense, outbuf, len, len > 14);
> }
>
> +#define GENERIC_CMD (uint32_t)0xFFFFFFFF
> +#define DISK_CMD (1u << TYPE_DISK)
> +#define TAPE_CMD (1u << TYPE_TAPE)
> +#define PRINTER_CMD (1u << TYPE_PRINTER)
> +#define PROCESSOR_CMD (1u << TYPE_PROCESSOR)
> +#define WORM_CMD (1u << TYPE_WORM)
> +#define ROM_CMD (1u << TYPE_ROM)
> +#define SCANNER_CMD (1u << TYPE_SCANNER)
> +#define MOD_CMD (1u << TYPE_MOD)
> +#define MEDIUM_CHANGER_CMD (1u << TYPE_MEDIUM_CHANGER)
> +#define ARRAY_CMD (1u << TYPE_STORAGE_ARRAY)
> +#define ENCLOSURE_CMD (1u << TYPE_ENCLOSURE)
> +#define RBC_CMD (1u << TYPE_RBC)
> +#define OSD_CMD (1u << TYPE_OSD)
> +
> +#define NO_ROM_CMD (GENERIC_CMD | ~ROM_CMD)
> +
> +uint32_t scsi_cmd_table[0x100] = {
> + [TEST_UNIT_READY] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [REWIND] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [REQUEST_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [FORMAT_UNIT] = DISK_CMD|ROM_CMD,
> + [READ_BLOCK_LIMITS] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [REASSIGN_BLOCKS] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_6] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
My spec says that MMC doesn't support READ(6)
> + [WRITE_6] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_REVERSE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [WRITE_FILEMARKS] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [SPACE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [INQUIRY] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [MODE_SELECT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RESERVE] = TAPE_CMD|PRINTER_CMD,
> + [RELEASE] = TAPE_CMD|PRINTER_CMD,
What's the reason for allowing this for tape, but not e.g. for disks?
It's marked as obsolete for both (and optional for quite a few other types)
> + [ERASE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [MODE_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [START_STOP] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RECEIVE_DIAGNOSTIC] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [SEND_DIAGNOSTIC] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_CAPACITY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
ROM_CMD, too
> + [READ_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [SEEK_10] = TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
Tape doesn't have SEEK(10) in the spec.
> + [WRITE_VERIFY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [VERIFY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_POSITION] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_BUFFER] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_BUFFER] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_LONG_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_LONG_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_SAME_10] = DISK_CMD,
> + [UNMAP] = DISK_CMD,
> + [READ_TOC] = ROM_CMD,
> + [REPORT_DENSITY_SUPPORT] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [GET_CONFIGURATION] = ROM_CMD,
> + [LOG_SELECT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [LOG_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [MODE_SELECT_10] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RESERVE_10] = PRINTER_CMD,
> + [RELEASE_10] = PRINTER_CMD,
> + [MODE_SENSE_10] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [VARLENGTH_CDB] = OSD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_FILEMARKS_16] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [ATA_PASSTHROUGH] = DISK_CMD|ROM_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [READ_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_VERIFY_16] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
Tape doesn't have this.
> + [LOCATE_16] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [WRITE_SAME_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD,
Again not for tape in my spec.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] scsi-disk: Check for supported commands
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:46:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2EC54C.5090208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311346277-32329-7-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
Am 22.07.2011 16:51, schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> Not every command is support for any device type. This patch adds
> a check for rejecting unsupported commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
We do emulate SEEK (6), but it's not in your scsi_cmd_table at all.
> ---
> hw/scsi-disk.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> index ae2c157..8ad90c0 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi-disk.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi-disk.c
> @@ -361,13 +361,107 @@ static int scsi_get_sense(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *outbuf, int len)
> return scsi_build_sense(s->sense, outbuf, len, len > 14);
> }
>
> +#define GENERIC_CMD (uint32_t)0xFFFFFFFF
> +#define DISK_CMD (1u << TYPE_DISK)
> +#define TAPE_CMD (1u << TYPE_TAPE)
> +#define PRINTER_CMD (1u << TYPE_PRINTER)
> +#define PROCESSOR_CMD (1u << TYPE_PROCESSOR)
> +#define WORM_CMD (1u << TYPE_WORM)
> +#define ROM_CMD (1u << TYPE_ROM)
> +#define SCANNER_CMD (1u << TYPE_SCANNER)
> +#define MOD_CMD (1u << TYPE_MOD)
> +#define MEDIUM_CHANGER_CMD (1u << TYPE_MEDIUM_CHANGER)
> +#define ARRAY_CMD (1u << TYPE_STORAGE_ARRAY)
> +#define ENCLOSURE_CMD (1u << TYPE_ENCLOSURE)
> +#define RBC_CMD (1u << TYPE_RBC)
> +#define OSD_CMD (1u << TYPE_OSD)
> +
> +#define NO_ROM_CMD (GENERIC_CMD | ~ROM_CMD)
> +
> +uint32_t scsi_cmd_table[0x100] = {
> + [TEST_UNIT_READY] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [REWIND] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [REQUEST_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [FORMAT_UNIT] = DISK_CMD|ROM_CMD,
> + [READ_BLOCK_LIMITS] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [REASSIGN_BLOCKS] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_6] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
My spec says that MMC doesn't support READ(6)
> + [WRITE_6] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_REVERSE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [WRITE_FILEMARKS] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [SPACE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [INQUIRY] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [MODE_SELECT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RESERVE] = TAPE_CMD|PRINTER_CMD,
> + [RELEASE] = TAPE_CMD|PRINTER_CMD,
What's the reason for allowing this for tape, but not e.g. for disks?
It's marked as obsolete for both (and optional for quite a few other types)
> + [ERASE] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [MODE_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [START_STOP] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RECEIVE_DIAGNOSTIC] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [SEND_DIAGNOSTIC] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_CAPACITY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
ROM_CMD, too
> + [READ_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [SEEK_10] = TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
Tape doesn't have SEEK(10) in the spec.
> + [WRITE_VERIFY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [VERIFY_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [READ_POSITION] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|ROM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_BUFFER] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_BUFFER] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [READ_LONG_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_LONG_10] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_SAME_10] = DISK_CMD,
> + [UNMAP] = DISK_CMD,
> + [READ_TOC] = ROM_CMD,
> + [REPORT_DENSITY_SUPPORT] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [GET_CONFIGURATION] = ROM_CMD,
> + [LOG_SELECT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [LOG_SENSE] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [MODE_SELECT_10] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [RESERVE_10] = PRINTER_CMD,
> + [RELEASE_10] = PRINTER_CMD,
> + [MODE_SENSE_10] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT] = GENERIC_CMD,
> + [VARLENGTH_CDB] = OSD_CMD,
> + [WRITE_FILEMARKS_16] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [ATA_PASSTHROUGH] = DISK_CMD|ROM_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [READ_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [WRITE_VERIFY_16] = DISK_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
> + [SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD|WORM_CMD|MOD_CMD|RBC_CMD,
Tape doesn't have this.
> + [LOCATE_16] = TAPE_CMD,
> + [WRITE_SAME_16] = DISK_CMD|TAPE_CMD,
Again not for tape in my spec.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 14:51 [PATCH 0/6][v2] Check for supported SCSI commands Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi-disk: Codingstyle fixes Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: Remove references to SET_WINDOW Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] scsi: Remove REZERO_UNIT emulation Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] scsi: Sanitize command definitions Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] scsi-disk: Remove 'drive_kind' Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-25 15:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-07-25 15:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-07-26 6:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 6:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 6:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-07-26 6:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi-disk: Check for supported commands Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-22 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 13:07 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-07-26 13:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2011-07-26 13:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 13:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 6:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-07-27 6:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2011-07-26 13:46 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2011-07-26 13:46 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-07-26 14:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 14:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-25 16:04 ` [PATCH 0/6][v2] Check for supported SCSI commands Markus Armbruster
2011-07-25 16:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2011-07-26 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-26 13:48 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-07-26 13:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2EC54C.5090208@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.