From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: synchronize dirty bitmap before unmapping a range
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:30:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E367230.6020705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E366C56.90705@siemens.com>
On 08/01/2011 12:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-08-01 10:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 08/01/2011 10:52 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-08-01 09:34, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> > On 2011-07-31 21:47, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> >> When a range is being unmapped, ask accelerators (e.g. kvm) to
> >> synchronize the
> >> >> dirty bitmap to avoid losing information forever.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixes grub2 screen update.
> >> >
> >> > I does.
> >> >
> >> > But something is still broken. As I reported before, the
> >> performance of
> >> > grub2 startup is an order of magnitude slower than with the existing
> >> > code. According to ftrace, we are getting tons of additional
> >> > EPT_MISCONFIG exits over the 0xA0000 segment. But I haven't spot the
> >> > difference yet. The effective slot setup as communicated to kvm looks
> >> > innocent.
> >>
> >> I take it back: We obviously once in a while resume the guest with the
> >> vga segment unmapped. And that, of course, ends up doing mmio instead of
> >> plain ram accesses.
> >>
> >
> > qemu-kvm.git 6b5956c573 and its predecessor fix the issue (and I think
> > they're even faster than upstream, but perhaps I'm not objective).
> >
>
> Just updated to the latest memory-region branch - how did you test it?
opensuse 11.4
> It does not link here due to forgotten rwhandler in Makefile.target.
>
I probably still have it in my tree, will update and re-push.
> Anyway, that commit has no impact on the issue I'm seeing. I'm also
> carrying transaction changes for cirrus here, but they have no
> noticeable impact. That indicates that the new API is not actually slow,
> it likely just has some bug.
It should be visible from the memory map dump.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: synchronize dirty bitmap before unmapping a range
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:30:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E367230.6020705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E366C56.90705@siemens.com>
On 08/01/2011 12:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-08-01 10:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 08/01/2011 10:52 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-08-01 09:34, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> > On 2011-07-31 21:47, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> >> When a range is being unmapped, ask accelerators (e.g. kvm) to
> >> synchronize the
> >> >> dirty bitmap to avoid losing information forever.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixes grub2 screen update.
> >> >
> >> > I does.
> >> >
> >> > But something is still broken. As I reported before, the
> >> performance of
> >> > grub2 startup is an order of magnitude slower than with the existing
> >> > code. According to ftrace, we are getting tons of additional
> >> > EPT_MISCONFIG exits over the 0xA0000 segment. But I haven't spot the
> >> > difference yet. The effective slot setup as communicated to kvm looks
> >> > innocent.
> >>
> >> I take it back: We obviously once in a while resume the guest with the
> >> vga segment unmapped. And that, of course, ends up doing mmio instead of
> >> plain ram accesses.
> >>
> >
> > qemu-kvm.git 6b5956c573 and its predecessor fix the issue (and I think
> > they're even faster than upstream, but perhaps I'm not objective).
> >
>
> Just updated to the latest memory-region branch - how did you test it?
opensuse 11.4
> It does not link here due to forgotten rwhandler in Makefile.target.
>
I probably still have it in my tree, will update and re-push.
> Anyway, that commit has no impact on the issue I'm seeing. I'm also
> carrying transaction changes for cirrus here, but they have no
> noticeable impact. That indicates that the new API is not actually slow,
> it likely just has some bug.
It should be visible from the memory map dump.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-01 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-31 19:47 [PATCH] memory: synchronize dirty bitmap before unmapping a range Avi Kivity
2011-07-31 19:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 7:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 7:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 7:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 7:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 8:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 8:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 9:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 9:30 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-08-01 9:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 10:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-01 10:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 10:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-08-05 16:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-05 16:47 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E367230.6020705@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.