From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/address: Add of_iomap_nocache
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:56:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3ACF3F.4040106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312454196-31028-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
On 08/04/2011 05:36 AM, David Brown wrote:
> Add uncached mappings from devicetree nodes similar to regular io
> mappings.
>
> SPARC is coherent, so there this call is the same as regular of_iomap.
>
> Cc: David Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown<davidb@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> v2 - Add implementation for SPARC
>
> drivers/of/address.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of_address.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 72c33fb..9bee7f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -613,3 +613,22 @@ void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *np, int index)
> return ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_iomap);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_iomap_nocache - Maps the memory mapped IO for a given
> + * device_node, using ioremap_nocache.
> + * @device: the device whose io range will be mapped
> + * @index: index of the io range
> + *
> + * Returns a pointer to the mapped memory
> + */
> +void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *np, int index)
> +{
> + struct resource res;
> +
> + if (of_address_to_resource(np, index,&res))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return ioremap_nocache(res.start, 1 + res.end - res.start);
> +}
resource_size()?
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_iomap_nocache);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
> index 3118623..0e4734b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_address.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@ extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_by_address(
> u64 base_address);
> extern void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index);
>
> +#ifndef SPARC
> +extern void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device, int index);
> +#else
> +static inline void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device,
> + int index)
> +{
> + return of_iomap(device, index);
> +}
> +#endif
Why is sparc special? It looks like it defines ioremap_nocache() as
ioremap() just like powerpc and some others, so shouldn't the normal
of_iomap_nocache just work?
-Scott
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of/address: Add of_iomap_nocache
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:56:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3ACF3F.4040106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312454196-31028-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
On 08/04/2011 05:36 AM, David Brown wrote:
> Add uncached mappings from devicetree nodes similar to regular io
> mappings.
>
> SPARC is coherent, so there this call is the same as regular of_iomap.
>
> Cc: David Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown<davidb@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> v2 - Add implementation for SPARC
>
> drivers/of/address.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of_address.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 72c33fb..9bee7f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -613,3 +613,22 @@ void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *np, int index)
> return ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_iomap);
> +
> +/**
> + * of_iomap_nocache - Maps the memory mapped IO for a given
> + * device_node, using ioremap_nocache.
> + * @device: the device whose io range will be mapped
> + * @index: index of the io range
> + *
> + * Returns a pointer to the mapped memory
> + */
> +void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *np, int index)
> +{
> + struct resource res;
> +
> + if (of_address_to_resource(np, index,&res))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return ioremap_nocache(res.start, 1 + res.end - res.start);
> +}
resource_size()?
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_iomap_nocache);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
> index 3118623..0e4734b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_address.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,16 @@ extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_by_address(
> u64 base_address);
> extern void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index);
>
> +#ifndef SPARC
> +extern void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device, int index);
> +#else
> +static inline void __iomem *of_iomap_nocache(struct device_node *device,
> + int index)
> +{
> + return of_iomap(device, index);
> +}
> +#endif
Why is sparc special? It looks like it defines ioremap_nocache() as
ioremap() just like powerpc and some others, so shouldn't the normal
of_iomap_nocache just work?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-04 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 9:53 [PATCH] of/address: Add of_iomap_nocache David Brown
2011-08-04 10:12 ` David Miller
2011-08-04 15:52 ` Rob Herring
2011-08-04 16:17 ` David Brown
2011-08-04 23:08 ` David Miller
2011-08-04 10:36 ` [PATCH v2] " David Brown
[not found] ` <1312454196-31028-1-git-send-email-davidb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-04 11:51 ` David Miller
2011-08-04 11:51 ` David Miller
2011-08-04 12:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-04 12:44 ` Kumar Gala
2011-08-04 13:10 ` David Brown
2011-08-04 16:56 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-08-04 16:56 ` Scott Wood
2011-08-04 16:58 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E3ACF3F.4040106@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.