All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: qingtao.cao@windriver.com
Cc: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@tresys.com>,
	Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	SELinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	refpolicy@oss1.tresys.com
Subject: Re: checkpolicy is broken (which is not)
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:29:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3B5593.7000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E3B441A.1090900@windriver.com>

On 08/04/2011 09:15 PM, Harry Ciao wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I think Dan's case below is a good example, that while
> libsepol/checkpolicy/etc upgraded to 2011-07-27 release, people may have
> not upgraded(or don't want/need to for the time being) the refpolicy to
> the 2011-07-26 release accordingly, then people would run into this problem.
> 
> I am wondering if there is a need to add one note in selinux project
> wiki page that once upgraded to 2011-07-27 release, at least the
> 3cbc9727 commit should be cherry-picked to refpolicy, if people still
> prefer to older releases.

I don't think we can/should do this.  New userspace should be able to
handle old policy.  You understand this code better than anyone, can you
find a solution such that old modules will still compile and work?

-Eric

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eparis@redhat.com (Eric Paris)
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
Subject: [refpolicy] checkpolicy is broken (which is not)
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:29:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3B5593.7000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E3B441A.1090900@windriver.com>

On 08/04/2011 09:15 PM, Harry Ciao wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I think Dan's case below is a good example, that while
> libsepol/checkpolicy/etc upgraded to 2011-07-27 release, people may have
> not upgraded(or don't want/need to for the time being) the refpolicy to
> the 2011-07-26 release accordingly, then people would run into this problem.
> 
> I am wondering if there is a need to add one note in selinux project
> wiki page that once upgraded to 2011-07-27 release, at least the
> 3cbc9727 commit should be cherry-picked to refpolicy, if people still
> prefer to older releases.

I don't think we can/should do this.  New userspace should be able to
handle old policy.  You understand this code better than anyone, can you
find a solution such that old modules will still compile and work?

-Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-05  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4E3AEA75.3090602@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <4E3B3D39.4020700@windriver.com>
2011-08-05  1:15   ` checkpolicy is broken (which is not) Harry Ciao
2011-08-05  2:29     ` Eric Paris [this message]
2011-08-05  2:29       ` [refpolicy] " Eric Paris
2011-08-05  4:19       ` Harry Ciao
2011-08-05 12:56         ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 12:59           ` Daniel J Walsh
2011-08-05 13:27             ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 14:42               ` Daniel J Walsh
2011-08-05 15:30                 ` Russell Coker
2011-08-05 16:20                   ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-08  6:41                     ` HarryCiao
2011-08-08 12:01                       ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 15:45             ` Joshua Brindle
2011-08-08  5:38             ` Harry Ciao
2011-08-05 16:58           ` James Carter
2011-08-05 17:23             ` Eric Paris
2011-08-07  4:43               ` Joshua Brindle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E3B5593.7000502@redhat.com \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=cpebenito@tresys.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=qingtao.cao@windriver.com \
    --cc=refpolicy@oss1.tresys.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.