From: rvaswani@codeaurora.org (Rohit Vaswani)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] GPIOLIB: add generic gpio_set_pull API
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:45:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E40912C.5040801@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9JG2V-66Wn7nwJz6tOkESoQAUJzAg-47YeMY0vzwu6T9O=Rg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/8/2011 3:57 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Grant Likely<grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Paul Mundt<lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:19:33PM -0700, Barry Song wrote:
>>>> Now there are many different implementations for GPIO pull configuration, for
>>>> example:
>>>> s3c_gpio_setpull()
>>>> tegra_pinmux_set_pullupdown()
>>>> chipcHw_setPinPullup()
>>>> gpio_pullup()
>>>> s3c2410_gpio_pullup()
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a new generic gpio_set_pull API so that all SoCs can have unified
>>>> codes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@csr.com>
>>> For arch/arm/mach-shmobile we also have gpio_pull_up() for board-g4evm.c
>>> and gpio_pull_down() for board-mackerel.c. Both of these would benefit
>>> from this sort of an API addition.
>> I think I'm okay with this API change. Linus, what say you? How does
>> this interact with your plans for pinctrl?
> If gpiolib accept the pullup control. gpiolib is better place to
> control gpio config.
> then remains are the gpio driver strength, and power down mode
> control. powerdown pull-up/down, powerdown in/out at samsung gpios.
If we add this API - the remaining gpio controls like drive strength and
function select could also be added, which eats into the pinmux domain.
Linus W. had a patch earlier which added an API for a gpio config to be
specified through gpiolib. " gpio: add a custom configuration mechanism
to gpiolib" which is sort of an extensible model of this API.
Thanks,
Rohit
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@codeaurora.org>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workgroup.linux@csr.com,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GPIOLIB: add generic gpio_set_pull API
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:45:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E40912C.5040801@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9JG2V-66Wn7nwJz6tOkESoQAUJzAg-47YeMY0vzwu6T9O=Rg@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/8/2011 3:57 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Grant Likely<grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Paul Mundt<lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:19:33PM -0700, Barry Song wrote:
>>>> Now there are many different implementations for GPIO pull configuration, for
>>>> example:
>>>> s3c_gpio_setpull()
>>>> tegra_pinmux_set_pullupdown()
>>>> chipcHw_setPinPullup()
>>>> gpio_pullup()
>>>> s3c2410_gpio_pullup()
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a new generic gpio_set_pull API so that all SoCs can have unified
>>>> codes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@csr.com>
>>> For arch/arm/mach-shmobile we also have gpio_pull_up() for board-g4evm.c
>>> and gpio_pull_down() for board-mackerel.c. Both of these would benefit
>>> from this sort of an API addition.
>> I think I'm okay with this API change. Linus, what say you? How does
>> this interact with your plans for pinctrl?
> If gpiolib accept the pullup control. gpiolib is better place to
> control gpio config.
> then remains are the gpio driver strength, and power down mode
> control. powerdown pull-up/down, powerdown in/out at samsung gpios.
If we add this API - the remaining gpio controls like drive strength and
function select could also be added, which eats into the pinmux domain.
Linus W. had a patch earlier which added an API for a gpio config to be
specified through gpiolib. " gpio: add a custom configuration mechanism
to gpiolib" which is sort of an extensible model of this API.
Thanks,
Rohit
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Thanks,
Rohit Vaswani
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-08 5:19 [PATCH] GPIOLIB: add generic gpio_set_pull API Barry Song
2011-08-08 5:19 ` Barry Song
2011-08-08 8:15 ` Paul Mundt
2011-08-08 8:15 ` Paul Mundt
2011-08-08 18:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-08 18:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-08 22:57 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-08-08 22:57 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-08-09 1:45 ` Rohit Vaswani [this message]
2011-08-09 1:45 ` Rohit Vaswani
2011-08-09 2:51 ` Barry Song
2011-08-09 2:51 ` Barry Song
2011-08-09 10:11 ` Linus Walleij
2011-08-09 10:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-19 3:25 ` Barry Song
2012-06-19 3:25 ` Barry Song
2012-06-20 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-20 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-20 10:07 ` Barry Song
2012-06-20 10:07 ` Barry Song
2012-06-20 14:31 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-20 14:31 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-21 7:48 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-21 7:48 ` Linus Walleij
2011-08-09 10:07 ` Linus Walleij
2011-08-09 10:07 ` Linus Walleij
2011-08-09 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
2011-08-09 10:04 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E40912C.5040801@codeaurora.org \
--to=rvaswani@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.