From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@ge.com>
To: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: vme: add functions for bridge module refcounting
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:50:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E425483.2050400@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110810091550.GA383@flamenco.cs.columbia.edu>
On 10/08/11 10:15, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:39:07 +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
>> And I think you need to go and do a grep of the code and find out where those
>> functions are actually used, rather than blindly relying on the comment.
> (snip)
>> Go grep the code.
>
> /me greps once again..
>
> RapidIO: there are no rapidIO drivers upstream, only switches
> and rionet, which does not manage RapidIO devices (it just sends
> Ethernet packets on top of RapidIO's messaging). So obviously
> there aren't any callers.
>
Yes there are. In rio-driver.c for a start:
/**
* rio_device_probe - Tell if a RIO device structure has a matching RIO
device id structure
* @dev: the RIO device structure to match against
*
* return 0 and set rio_dev->driver when drv claims rio_dev, else error
*/
static int rio_device_probe(struct device *dev)
{
struct rio_driver *rdrv = to_rio_driver(dev->driver);
struct rio_dev *rdev = to_rio_dev(dev);
int error = -ENODEV;
const struct rio_device_id *id;
if (!rdev->driver && rdrv->probe) {
if (!rdrv->id_table)
return error;
id = rio_match_device(rdrv->id_table, rdev);
rio_dev_get(rdev);
if (id)
error = rdrv->probe(rdev, id);
if (error >= 0) {
rdev->driver = rdrv;
error = 0;
} else
rio_dev_put(rdev);
}
return error;
}
Doing what Manohar suggested and I have agreed with.
> PCI: pci_dev_get() referenced in 60 files. Another way of
> explicitly incrementing the refcount of a pci device is with
> pci_get_device(), which searches in the device list for a
> particular one by its vendor/device ID. This function is
> referenced in 127 files.
>
Again, in pci-driver.c:
static int pci_device_probe(struct device * dev)
{
int error = 0;
struct pci_driver *drv;
struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
drv = to_pci_driver(dev->driver);
pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
pci_dev_get(pci_dev);
error = __pci_device_probe(drv, pci_dev);
if (error)
pci_dev_put(pci_dev);
return error;
}
Again, doing as Manohar suggested.
For those drivers using pci_get_device() - P313 of the Linux Device Drivers
3rd Ed, under "Old-style PCI Probing". Not a mechanism currently supported for
the VME bus.
> USB: usb_get_dev() referenced in 75 files.
>
I've already explained that I don't think the USB bus is good for comparison
due to very real differences in bus topology and use.
> There are also lots of direct calls to get_device() from .probe
> methods of devices not tied to a particular bus.
>
Which may therefore have nothing to do with a bus.
> Guess that was enough grepping.
>
It seems not quite.
>> Suitable bug fixes are welcome.
>
> I sent a fix (as part of an admittedly large patchset) in
> Nov 2010[1], ie 9 months ago, you were sick at the time and
> told me you'd have a look at the changes later[2], which
> unfortunately never happened, even after pinging you off-list.
>
Some of those patches were applied:
http://git.kernel.org/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git;a=history;f=drivers/staging/vme;hb=HEAD
The remaining patches completely changed the VME bus model. I said at the time
I wasn't overly happy with the model you had put forward. Take this as my review:
- I am not happy with the proposed alternative model.
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I'm afraid my TODO list sometimes
ends up acting as a stack rather than a FIFO.
> Anyway let's forget that, Manohar's patches are what matters now.
>
Will do.
Martyn
--
Martyn Welch (Principal Software Engineer) | Registered in England and
GE Intelligent Platforms | Wales (3828642) at 100
T +44(0)127322748 | Barbirolli Square, Manchester,
E martyn.welch@ge.com | M2 3AB VAT:GB 927559189
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 10:20 [PATCH 0/8] VME Driver Fixes Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] staging: vme_user: change kmalloc+memset to kzalloc Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:52 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-10 7:44 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] staging: vme: allow explicit assignment of bus numbers Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 11:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-08-01 12:12 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 13:06 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 14:31 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 15:50 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-02 11:54 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-02 14:57 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-03 8:54 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-04 9:16 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] staging: vme: make [alloc|free]_consistent bridge specific Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 11:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-08-01 12:24 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 13:41 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 13:40 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 14:00 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 14:05 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 4/8] staging: vme: keep track of registered buses Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 5/8] staging: vme: add functions for bridge module refcounting Manohar Vanga
2011-08-03 14:04 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-03 14:06 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-03 15:23 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-04 7:23 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-04 16:34 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-05 7:45 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-05 9:04 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-05 9:24 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-05 17:47 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-08 8:01 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-08 9:14 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-08 9:42 ` Martyn Welch
[not found] ` <4E3FABDA.8080204@ge.com>
[not found] ` <20110808101140.GA21300@flamenco.cs.columbia.edu>
2011-08-08 11:06 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-08 17:22 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-08 18:04 ` Greg KH
2011-08-09 9:00 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-09 19:19 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-10 7:39 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-10 9:15 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-10 9:50 ` Martyn Welch [this message]
2011-08-10 18:35 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-09 13:24 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-09 14:26 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-09 14:35 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-09 15:05 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-09 18:49 ` Emilio G. Cota
2011-08-10 6:52 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] staging: vme: rename *_slot_get to *_get_slot Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 12:29 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 12:31 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-09 15:18 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-09 15:25 ` Greg KH
2011-08-09 15:32 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] staging: vme: add struct vme_dev for VME devices Manohar Vanga
2011-08-09 15:19 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 10:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] staging: vme: make match() driver specific to improve non-VME64x support Manohar Vanga
2011-08-03 9:16 ` Martyn Welch
2011-08-03 12:18 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 0/8] VME Driver Fixes Martyn Welch
2011-08-01 14:32 ` Manohar Vanga
2011-08-23 22:07 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E425483.2050400@ge.com \
--to=martyn.welch@ge.com \
--cc=cota@braap.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.