All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>,
	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "Munegowda,
	Keshava" <keshava_mgowda@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP4: clock: re-enable previous clockdomain enable/disable sequence (was Re: Oops on ehci_hcd when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:45:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4F50F6.9040900@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108192131170.24016@utopia.booyaka.com>

> From: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:59:56 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: clock: re-enable previous clockdomain enable/disable
>   sequence
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> After commit 665d001338b494d6d62810aa99b4c0fa1a0884b9 ("OMAP2+: hwmod:
> Follow the recommended PRCM module enable sequence"), device drivers
> for OMAP IP blocks that do not use runtime PM can cause oopses or
> kernel instability[1][2].
>
> This is because those non-runtime PM drivers do not use the hwmod
> code, which implements the correct IP block enable and disable
> sequence.
>
> Several options for dealing with this problem have been proposed:
>
> 1. Add a new field to the OMAP struct clk to mark clocks that are
>     currently used by non-runtime PM drivers.  Modify the clock code to
>     use the old clockdomain sequence for these marked clocks.  As
>     drivers are converted to use runtime PM, remove the annotation from
>     the clocks.
>
> 2. Similar to #1, but associate the flag with the struct omap_clk
>     instead.
>
> 3. Add IDLEST wait support to the OMAP4 clock code, similar to the way
>     it is implemented for OMAP2/3, and enable it in each struct clk
>     currently used by non-runtime PM drivers.  As drivers are converted
>     to use runtime PM, remove the annotation from the clocks.
>
> 4. Do nothing; leave the problem to those responsible for the
>     unconverted drivers.
>
> 5. Re-enable clock-based clockdomain control in the OMAP4 clock code.
>     This would revert back to the behavior of Linux 3.0, simply with a
>     slightly longer module enable/disable latency.
>
> Unfortunately, no approach seemed particularly good.  Options 1
> through 3 seemed unwise due to the following reasons:
>
> A. The OMAP struct clks are intended primarily to describe hardware
>     clock nodes, and the intention is that no driver-specific data
>     should be stored there (applies to #1)
>
> B. The resulting patch would have been quite large for the -rc series
>     (applies to #1, #2, #3)
>
> C. The patch would have been a new, yet temporary hack; and similar fixes
>     have drawn negative comments in the recent past (see for example [3])
>
> Option 4 is undesirable because commit
> 665d001338b494d6d62810aa99b4c0fa1a0884b9 ("OMAP2+: hwmod: Follow the
> recommended PRCM module enable sequence") has resulted in a less
> stable kernel; and kernel stability is more important than OMAP4 power
> management.
>
> Option 5 is the approach taken in this patch.  This seemed to be the
> least intrusive approach for 3.1-rc.
>
> The approach in this patch was originally proposed by Ohad Ben-Cohen
> <ohad@wizery.com>.  I'm simply writing the commit message and passing
> it along.
>
> ...
>
> Thanks to Luciano Coelho<coelho@ti.com>  for reporting the problem.
> Thanks to Ohad Ben-Cohen<ohad@wizery.com>  for tracking the problem
> down, generating a temporary workaround, and proposing a patch to deal
> with the problem.  Thanks to Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>  for
> proposing another patch to deal with the problem.  Thanks to Felipe
> Balbi<balbi@ti.com>  for comments.
>
> 1. Coelho, Luciano<coelho@ti.com>.  _Re: Oops on ehci_hcd when
>     booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda_.  Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:26:08 +0300.
>     Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>  mailing list.  Available
>     from (among others)
>     http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-omap/msg55213.html
>
> 2. Munegowda, Keshava<keshava_mgowda@ti.com>. _Re: Oops on ehci_hcd
>     when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda_.  Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:51:05 +0530.
>     Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>  mailing list.  Available
>     from (among others)
>     http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-omap/msg55371.html
>
> 3. King, Russell<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>.  _Re: [PATCH 5/8] OMAP4:
>     PM: TEMP: Prevent l3init from idling/force sleep_.  Thu, 23 Jun
>     2011 16:22:49 +0100.  Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
>     mailing list.  Available from (among others)
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg51392.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Luciano Coelho<coelho@ti.com>
> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen<ohad@wizery.com>
> Cc: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
> Cc: Benoît Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
> ---
Thanks for the change log.
Here is my ack if you need one.

Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Regards
santosh



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: clock: re-enable previous clockdomain enable/disable sequence (was Re: Oops on ehci_hcd when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:45:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4F50F6.9040900@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108192131170.24016@utopia.booyaka.com>

> From: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:59:56 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: clock: re-enable previous clockdomain enable/disable
>   sequence
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> After commit 665d001338b494d6d62810aa99b4c0fa1a0884b9 ("OMAP2+: hwmod:
> Follow the recommended PRCM module enable sequence"), device drivers
> for OMAP IP blocks that do not use runtime PM can cause oopses or
> kernel instability[1][2].
>
> This is because those non-runtime PM drivers do not use the hwmod
> code, which implements the correct IP block enable and disable
> sequence.
>
> Several options for dealing with this problem have been proposed:
>
> 1. Add a new field to the OMAP struct clk to mark clocks that are
>     currently used by non-runtime PM drivers.  Modify the clock code to
>     use the old clockdomain sequence for these marked clocks.  As
>     drivers are converted to use runtime PM, remove the annotation from
>     the clocks.
>
> 2. Similar to #1, but associate the flag with the struct omap_clk
>     instead.
>
> 3. Add IDLEST wait support to the OMAP4 clock code, similar to the way
>     it is implemented for OMAP2/3, and enable it in each struct clk
>     currently used by non-runtime PM drivers.  As drivers are converted
>     to use runtime PM, remove the annotation from the clocks.
>
> 4. Do nothing; leave the problem to those responsible for the
>     unconverted drivers.
>
> 5. Re-enable clock-based clockdomain control in the OMAP4 clock code.
>     This would revert back to the behavior of Linux 3.0, simply with a
>     slightly longer module enable/disable latency.
>
> Unfortunately, no approach seemed particularly good.  Options 1
> through 3 seemed unwise due to the following reasons:
>
> A. The OMAP struct clks are intended primarily to describe hardware
>     clock nodes, and the intention is that no driver-specific data
>     should be stored there (applies to #1)
>
> B. The resulting patch would have been quite large for the -rc series
>     (applies to #1, #2, #3)
>
> C. The patch would have been a new, yet temporary hack; and similar fixes
>     have drawn negative comments in the recent past (see for example [3])
>
> Option 4 is undesirable because commit
> 665d001338b494d6d62810aa99b4c0fa1a0884b9 ("OMAP2+: hwmod: Follow the
> recommended PRCM module enable sequence") has resulted in a less
> stable kernel; and kernel stability is more important than OMAP4 power
> management.
>
> Option 5 is the approach taken in this patch.  This seemed to be the
> least intrusive approach for 3.1-rc.
>
> The approach in this patch was originally proposed by Ohad Ben-Cohen
> <ohad@wizery.com>.  I'm simply writing the commit message and passing
> it along.
>
> ...
>
> Thanks to Luciano Coelho<coelho@ti.com>  for reporting the problem.
> Thanks to Ohad Ben-Cohen<ohad@wizery.com>  for tracking the problem
> down, generating a temporary workaround, and proposing a patch to deal
> with the problem.  Thanks to Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>  for
> proposing another patch to deal with the problem.  Thanks to Felipe
> Balbi<balbi@ti.com>  for comments.
>
> 1. Coelho, Luciano<coelho@ti.com>.  _Re: Oops on ehci_hcd when
>     booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda_.  Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:26:08 +0300.
>     Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>  mailing list.  Available
>     from (among others)
>     http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-omap/msg55213.html
>
> 2. Munegowda, Keshava<keshava_mgowda@ti.com>. _Re: Oops on ehci_hcd
>     when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda_.  Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:51:05 +0530.
>     Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>  mailing list.  Available
>     from (among others)
>     http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-omap/msg55371.html
>
> 3. King, Russell<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>.  _Re: [PATCH 5/8] OMAP4:
>     PM: TEMP: Prevent l3init from idling/force sleep_.  Thu, 23 Jun
>     2011 16:22:49 +0100.  Posted to the<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
>     mailing list.  Available from (among others)
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg51392.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Luciano Coelho<coelho@ti.com>
> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen<ohad@wizery.com>
> Cc: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
> Cc: Beno?t Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
> ---
Thanks for the change log.
Here is my ack if you need one.

Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Regards
santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-20  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-06 10:37 Oops on ehci_hcd when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda Luciano Coelho
2011-06-06 10:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-06-06 11:02   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-06-06 11:05     ` Luciano Coelho
2011-08-09 11:26       ` Luciano Coelho
2011-08-09 14:47         ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-09 15:00           ` Munegowda, Keshava
     [not found]             ` <CAP05o4LyyjXFHyoug1d-CDS_S2VdEgngT-X4iQ8jwbOJ1S42dg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-09 16:49               ` Munegowda, Keshava
2011-08-09 18:00                 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-08-11  8:07         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
     [not found]           ` <CAK=WgbatbaSj=U7+SAva4Woh7uaOoCzQck5yjfLvVGLR-UCVHg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-11  8:19             ` Luciano Coelho
2011-08-11  8:21           ` Munegowda, Keshava
2011-08-11 12:03             ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-11 11:59           ` Rajendra Nayak
     [not found]             ` <4E43C41E.1080808-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-11 12:20               ` Luciano Coelho
2011-08-11 12:33                 ` Munegowda, Keshava
2011-08-19 22:48                   ` [PATCH] OMAP4: clock: re-enable previous clockdomain enable/disable sequence (was Re: Oops on ehci_hcd when booting 3.0.0-rc2 on panda) Paul Walmsley
2011-08-19 22:48                     ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-19 23:08                     ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-19 23:08                       ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-20  3:32                       ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-20  3:32                         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-20  6:15                         ` Santosh [this message]
2011-08-20  6:15                           ` Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E4F50F6.9040900@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=coelho@ti.com \
    --cc=keshava_mgowda@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.