From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: fix initial shrinker size handling
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:47:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E534D13.5020102@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822143006.60f4b560.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
<snip>
>> long new_nr;
>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>
>> + max_pass = do_shrinker_shrink(shrinker, shrink, 0);
>> + if (max_pass<= 0)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /*
>> * copy the current shrinker scan count into a local variable
>> * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations
>> @@ -266,7 +270,6 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink,
>> } while (cmpxchg(&shrinker->nr, nr, 0) != nr);
>>
>> total_scan = nr;
>> - max_pass = do_shrinker_shrink(shrinker, shrink, 0);
>> delta = (4 * nr_pages_scanned) / shrinker->seeks;
>> delta *= max_pass;
>> do_div(delta, lru_pages + 1);
>
> Why was the shrinker call moved to before the alteration of shrinker->nr?
I think, if we skip shrinker we shouldn't reset accumulated pressure,
because next reclaimer (for example with less strict gfp) can use it.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: fix initial shrinker size handling
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:47:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E534D13.5020102@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822143006.60f4b560.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
<snip>
>> long new_nr;
>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>
>> + max_pass = do_shrinker_shrink(shrinker, shrink, 0);
>> + if (max_pass<= 0)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> /*
>> * copy the current shrinker scan count into a local variable
>> * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations
>> @@ -266,7 +270,6 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink,
>> } while (cmpxchg(&shrinker->nr, nr, 0) != nr);
>>
>> total_scan = nr;
>> - max_pass = do_shrinker_shrink(shrinker, shrink, 0);
>> delta = (4 * nr_pages_scanned) / shrinker->seeks;
>> delta *= max_pass;
>> do_div(delta, lru_pages + 1);
>
> Why was the shrinker call moved to before the alteration of shrinker->nr?
I think, if we skip shrinker we shouldn't reset accumulated pressure,
because next reclaimer (for example with less strict gfp) can use it.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-23 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 11:17 [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: fix initial shrinker size handling Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 11:17 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 11:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmscan: use atomic-long for shrinker batching Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 11:17 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-22 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-22 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-22 23:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23 6:56 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-23 6:56 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: fix initial shrinker size handling Andrew Morton
2011-08-22 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-22 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-22 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23 6:47 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2011-08-23 6:47 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2011-08-22 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-22 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-22 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-22 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-23 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-13 18:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-13 18:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-05 21:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-05 21:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-05 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-05 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E534D13.5020102@openvz.org \
--to=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.