From: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, tony@atomide.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/22] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:42:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53A74E.4030002@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312455893-14922-12-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>
On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> It is not required to use hard-coded offsets any more in context save and
> restore functions and instead use the generic offsets which have been correctly
> initialized during device registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma<tarun.kanti@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
> ---
$SUB
/s /ctx /context please
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 41 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> index 8745c3a..0ee9a55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
> pdata->regs->irqstatus = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1;
> pdata->regs->irqstatus2 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS2;
> pdata->regs->irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1;
> + pdata->regs->irqenable2 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2;
> pdata->regs->set_irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETIRQENABLE1;
> pdata->regs->clr_irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_CLEARIRQENABLE1;
> pdata->regs->debounce = OMAP24XX_GPIO_DEBOUNCE_VAL;
> @@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
> pdata->regs->irqstatus = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS0;
> pdata->regs->irqstatus2 = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1;
> pdata->regs->irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET0;
> + pdata->regs->irqenable2 = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET1;
> pdata->regs->set_irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET0;
> pdata->regs->clr_irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSCLR0;
> pdata->regs->debounce = OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> index 7d12fe8..0ad4f49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct omap_gpio_reg_offs {
> u16 irqstatus;
> u16 irqstatus2;
> u16 irqenable;
> + u16 irqenable2;
> u16 set_irqenable;
> u16 clr_irqenable;
> u16 debounce;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index be561be..e7c9fe5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -1348,45 +1348,42 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
> static void omap_gpio_save_context(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> {
> bank->context.irqenable1 =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->irqenable);
> bank->context.irqenable2 =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->irqenable2);
> bank->context.wake_en =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> - bank->context.ctrl = __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> - bank->context.oe = __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_status);
Not related to this patch but saving the status register just useless.
You should rather save/restore 'wkup_set' register.
Can you please fix this in relevant patch. O.w this patch looks ok to
me.
Regards
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/22] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:42:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53A74E.4030002@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312455893-14922-12-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>
On Thursday 04 August 2011 04:34 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> It is not required to use hard-coded offsets any more in context save and
> restore functions and instead use the generic offsets which have been correctly
> initialized during device registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma<tarun.kanti@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V<charu@ti.com>
> ---
$SUB
/s /ctx /context please
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c | 2 +
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 41 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> index 8745c3a..0ee9a55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
> pdata->regs->irqstatus = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1;
> pdata->regs->irqstatus2 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQSTATUS2;
> pdata->regs->irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1;
> + pdata->regs->irqenable2 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2;
> pdata->regs->set_irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETIRQENABLE1;
> pdata->regs->clr_irqenable = OMAP24XX_GPIO_CLEARIRQENABLE1;
> pdata->regs->debounce = OMAP24XX_GPIO_DEBOUNCE_VAL;
> @@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
> pdata->regs->irqstatus = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS0;
> pdata->regs->irqstatus2 = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS1;
> pdata->regs->irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET0;
> + pdata->regs->irqenable2 = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET1;
> pdata->regs->set_irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSSET0;
> pdata->regs->clr_irqenable = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUSCLR0;
> pdata->regs->debounce = OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCINGTIME;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> index 7d12fe8..0ad4f49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct omap_gpio_reg_offs {
> u16 irqstatus;
> u16 irqstatus2;
> u16 irqenable;
> + u16 irqenable2;
> u16 set_irqenable;
> u16 clr_irqenable;
> u16 debounce;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index be561be..e7c9fe5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -1348,45 +1348,42 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
> static void omap_gpio_save_context(struct gpio_bank *bank)
> {
> bank->context.irqenable1 =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->irqenable);
> bank->context.irqenable2 =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->irqenable2);
> bank->context.wake_en =
> - __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN);
> - bank->context.ctrl = __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL);
> - bank->context.oe = __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_OE);
> + __raw_readl(bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_status);
Not related to this patch but saving the status register just useless.
You should rather save/restore 'wkup_set' register.
Can you please fix this in relevant patch. O.w this patch looks ok to
me.
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-23 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 11:04 [PATCH v5 00/22] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] gpio/omap: remove dependency on gpio_bank_count Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-29 12:18 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-29 12:18 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] gpio/omap: use flag to identify wakeup domain Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:45 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:45 ` Santosh
2011-08-25 20:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-25 20:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-26 3:57 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-26 3:57 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2011-08-26 14:11 ` Santosh
2011-08-26 14:11 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] gpio/omap: fix pwrdm_post_transition call sequence Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] gpio/omap: handle save/restore ctx in GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:53 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:53 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:47 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] gpio/omap: make non-wakeup GPIO part of pdata Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:54 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:54 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] gpio/omap: avoid cpu checks during module ena/disable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 12:57 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 12:57 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] gpio/omap: further cleanup using wakeup_status register Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:02 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:02 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap1 related macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:04 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:04 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] gpio/omap: use level/edge detect reg offsets Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:08 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:08 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in ctxt save/restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:12 ` Santosh [this message]
2011-08-23 13:12 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] gpio/omap: cleanup set_gpio_triggering function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:21 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:21 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:26 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:26 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] gpio/omap: use pinctrl offset instead of macro Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 13:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 13:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] gpio/omap: use readl in irq_handler for all access Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:25 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:25 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] gpio/omap: remove bank->method & METHOD_* macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:27 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] gpio/omap: fix bankwidth for OMAP7xx MPUIO Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:28 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:28 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:34 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:34 ` Santosh
2011-08-24 4:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-24 4:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-08-24 6:19 ` Santosh
2011-08-24 6:19 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] gpio/omap: optimize suspend and resume functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:35 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and resume_after_idle Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:40 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:40 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] gpio/omap: skip operations in runtime callbacks Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:41 ` Santosh
2011-08-04 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] gpio/omap: remove omap_gpio_save_context overhead Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-04 11:04 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2011-08-23 14:42 ` Santosh
2011-08-23 14:42 ` Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E53A74E.4030002@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=charu@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.