All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c: add missing kfree
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:04:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53F9CE.1040106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOZdJXX_BS7GMtmyqiS91QByhrjANtKpbqrstR8g-L80r_N8qg@mail.gmail.com>

Ben, Kumar, can one of you take a look at my question and help me out?

 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> index af1a5df..b6731e4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ void __init ehv_pic_init(void)
>>
>>        if (!ehv_pic->irqhost) {
>>                of_node_put(np);
>> +               kfree(ehv_pic);
>>                return;
>>        }
> 
> Although the fix is correct, I think there is another bug in this
> function.  'np' is not released when the function finishes
> successfully.   I've looked at other functions that use
> irq_alloc_host(), and most of them do the same thing: they don't call
> of_node_put() on the device node pointer.  The only exception I've
> found is mpc5121_ads_cpld_pic_init().
> 
> Ben, Kumar: am I missing something?  irq_alloc_host() calls of_node_get():
> 
> 	host->of_node = of_node_get(of_node);
> 
> so doesn't that mean that the caller of irq_alloc_host() should
> release the device node pointer?
> 


-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c: add missing kfree
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:04:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53F9CE.1040106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOZdJXX_BS7GMtmyqiS91QByhrjANtKpbqrstR8g-L80r_N8qg@mail.gmail.com>

Ben, Kumar, can one of you take a look at my question and help me out?

 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> index af1a5df..b6731e4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ void __init ehv_pic_init(void)
>>
>>        if (!ehv_pic->irqhost) {
>>                of_node_put(np);
>> +               kfree(ehv_pic);
>>                return;
>>        }
> 
> Although the fix is correct, I think there is another bug in this
> function.  'np' is not released when the function finishes
> successfully.   I've looked at other functions that use
> irq_alloc_host(), and most of them do the same thing: they don't call
> of_node_put() on the device node pointer.  The only exception I've
> found is mpc5121_ads_cpld_pic_init().
> 
> Ben, Kumar: am I missing something?  irq_alloc_host() calls of_node_get():
> 
> 	host->of_node = of_node_get(of_node);
> 
> so doesn't that mean that the caller of irq_alloc_host() should
> release the device node pointer?
> 


-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c: add missing kfree
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:04:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E53F9CE.1040106@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOZdJXX_BS7GMtmyqiS91QByhrjANtKpbqrstR8g-L80r_N8qg@mail.gmail.com>

Ben, Kumar, can one of you take a look at my question and help me out?

 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> index af1a5df..b6731e4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
>> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ void __init ehv_pic_init(void)
>>
>>        if (!ehv_pic->irqhost) {
>>                of_node_put(np);
>> +               kfree(ehv_pic);
>>                return;
>>        }
> 
> Although the fix is correct, I think there is another bug in this
> function.  'np' is not released when the function finishes
> successfully.   I've looked at other functions that use
> irq_alloc_host(), and most of them do the same thing: they don't call
> of_node_put() on the device node pointer.  The only exception I've
> found is mpc5121_ads_cpld_pic_init().
> 
> Ben, Kumar: am I missing something?  irq_alloc_host() calls of_node_get():
> 
> 	host->of_node = of_node_get(of_node);
> 
> so doesn't that mean that the caller of irq_alloc_host() should
> release the device node pointer?
> 


-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-08 11:18 [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c: add missing kfree Julia Lawall
2011-08-08 11:18 ` Julia Lawall
2011-08-08 11:18 ` Julia Lawall
2011-08-15 22:55 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-08-15 22:55   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-08-15 22:55   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-08-23 19:04   ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2011-08-23 19:04     ` Timur Tabi
2011-08-23 19:04     ` Timur Tabi
2011-08-23 18:38 ` Timur Tabi
2011-08-23 18:38   ` Timur Tabi
2011-08-23 18:38   ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-24  7:16 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-24  7:16   ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-24  7:16   ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E53F9CE.1040106@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.