* 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0
@ 2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2011-08-28 71 21 17
2011-08-14 63 22 19
2011-07-10 38 16 13
2011-06-26 22 14 12
2011-06-12 8 7 7
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject : acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter : sbraz <hi.sbraz@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject : BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject : INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject : cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>
Date : 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject : IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter : Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml@fsing.rootsland.net>
Date : 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject : PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter : g0re <g0re@null.net>
Date : 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject : RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter : Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk>
Date : 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject : suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Date : 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID : <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject : WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter : Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak@epoczta.pl>
Date : 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject : HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter : Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Date : 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject : firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter : Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject : [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter : Marek Hobler, 'neutrinus' <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date : 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject : T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter : Marc Koschewski <marc@osknowledge.org>
Date : 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject : Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter : Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>
Date : 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject : Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter : <q222@gmx.com>
Date : 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch : http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject : USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
Date : 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject : Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter : Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.39 and 3.0, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* 3.1-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0
@ 2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2011-08-28 71 21 17
2011-08-14 63 22 19
2011-07-10 38 16 13
2011-06-26 22 14 12
2011-06-12 8 7 7
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject : acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter : sbraz <hi.sbraz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject : BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject : INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject : cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harri-z+8oq0O/ijmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject : IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter : Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject : PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter : g0re <g0re-ifvz4xmYPRU@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject : RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter : Philip Armstrong <phil-awZZuG094qgqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject : suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID : <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject : WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter : Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak-tIkWECEXGi3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject : HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter : Andreas Steinmetz <ast-sy9/ueDX/ME@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject : firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter : Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject : [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter : Marek Hobler, 'neutrinus' <kernellist@neutrinus.com>
Date : 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject : T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter : Marc Koschewski <marc-e1Wt+8K1Ta8ZEwqihLH0+Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject : Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter : Eric Valette <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject : Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter : <q222-KK0ffGbhmjU@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch : http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject : USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject : Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter : Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.39 and 3.0, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36912
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #38582] T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Marc Koschewski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38582
Subject : T510 43495KG won't resume with 32bit installation
Submitter : Marc Koschewski <marc-e1Wt+8K1Ta8ZEwqihLH0+Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-06-30 22:39 (60 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Andrei Warkentin, Chris Ball, Peter Vollmer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Andrei Warkentin, Chris Ball, Peter Vollmer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:51 ` Chris Ball
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2011-08-28 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Andrei Warkentin, Peter Vollmer
Hi Rafael,
On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> writing and io errors on insert
> Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
Yes, still present.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
@ 2011-08-28 19:51 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2011-08-28 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Andrei Warkentin, Peter Vollmer
Hi Rafael,
On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> writing and io errors on insert
> Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
> Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
Yes, still present.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <m2fwklxqjy.fsf-mq7wBgpjGkdLDiiyqF6/jw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
2011-08-28 19:51 ` Chris Ball
@ 2011-08-28 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Andrei Warkentin, Peter Vollmer
On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> > Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> > writing and io errors on insert
> > Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
> > http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
>
> Yes, still present.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #38922] Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition writing and io errors on insert
@ 2011-08-28 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Ball
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Andrei Warkentin, Peter Vollmer
On Sunday, August 28, 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Sun, Aug 28 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922
> > Subject : Lenovo T420 (Sandy Bridge) Crashes on SD Card gpt partition
> > writing and io errors on insert
> > Submitter : Peter Vollmer <vollmerpeter@googlemail.com>
> > Date : 2011-07-07 17:33 (53 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
> > http://git.kernel.org/linus/a3c7778f8153b9e4eceea6738973280b9e63c618
>
> Yes, still present.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #38622] [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Marek Hobler, 'neutrinus'
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Subject : [radeon cayman regresion] artefacts on screen
Submitter : Marek Hobler, 'neutrinus' <kernellist-X/h6sc6Dz0uakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-01 09:35 (59 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity,
Jay Ren, Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity,
Jay Ren, Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-29 9:03 ` Ren, Yongjie
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Ren, Yongjie @ 2011-08-29 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity,
Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
The commit I tried is below.
commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700
Best Regards,
Yongjie Ren (Jay)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 3:01 AM
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Cc: Kernel Testers List; Maciej Rutecki; Florian Mickler; Avi Kivity; Ren, Yongjie;
> Marcelo Tosatti; Stefan Hajnoczi
> Subject: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread* RE: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
@ 2011-08-29 9:03 ` Ren, Yongjie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Ren, Yongjie @ 2011-08-29 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity,
Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1345 bytes --]
I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
The commit I tried is below.
commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700
Best Regards,
Yongjie Ren (Jay)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 3:01 AM
> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Cc: Kernel Testers List; Maciej Rutecki; Florian Mickler; Avi Kivity; Ren, Yongjie;
> Marcelo Tosatti; Stefan Hajnoczi
> Subject: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39412
> Subject : Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
> Submitter : Jay Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com>
> Date : 2011-07-15 15:31 (45 days old)
>
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(階ŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CE59C043D0EC3349B2BF41C0EC72229B12D24D15E8-QQHDSDV1ERZpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
2011-08-29 9:03 ` Ren, Yongjie
@ 2011-08-29 16:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-29 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ren, Yongjie
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Monday, August 29, 2011, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
> The commit I tried is below.
> commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #39412] Win Vista and Win2K8 guests' network breaks down
@ 2011-08-29 16:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-29 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ren, Yongjie
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, Avi Kivity, Marcelo Tosatti, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Monday, August 29, 2011, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> I've verified this bug in Linus' tree 3.1.0-rc4. It got fixed, so I closed the bug.
> The commit I tried is below.
> commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Sun Aug 28 21:16:01 2011 -0700
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39192] firmware_install fails with parallel make
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Ambroz Bizjak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39192
Subject : firmware_install fails with parallel make
Submitter : Ambroz Bizjak <ambrop7-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-12 09:35 (48 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Witold Baryluk
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk-W6Hso+/wx31C2Nf1M/Lcnw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Witold Baryluk
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2011-12-13 4:11 ` Witold Baryluk
2011-12-13 17:35 ` Jan Kara
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 66+ messages in thread
From: Witold Baryluk @ 2011-12-13 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler, linux-ext4, Andreas Dilger, Theodore Ts'o
On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
>
Hi,
This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5
I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
triggers like a mad.
So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
presure was correct.
It is just like this
# dmesg | grep dirty
[122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
#
dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.
I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
$ uname -a
Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
$
32-bit intel compatible cpu
Regards,
Witek
--
Witold Baryluk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #39732] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
2011-12-13 4:11 ` Witold Baryluk
@ 2011-12-13 17:35 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20111213173542.GH11747-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 66+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2011-12-13 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Witold Baryluk
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, linux-ext4, Andreas Dilger,
Theodore Ts'o
Hi,
On Tue 13-12-11 05:11:44, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> On 08-28 21:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39732
> > Subject : JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-2, blocknr = 2512725). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> > Submitter : Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> > Date : 2011-07-22 04:22 (38 days old)
>
> This bug still exists in 3.1.0 and 3.2.0-rc5
>
> I spoted it again few days ago, because I moved from me laptop with 2GB
> to temporary desktop with 256MB of RAM, and not it
> triggers like a mad.
>
> So my initial suspicious that it only shows up on big memory
> presure was correct.
>
>
> It is just like this
> # dmesg | grep dirty
> [122647.953872] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1019852). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122647.954598] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043195). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122647.955213] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043197). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122689.978864] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 498559). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.485461] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68282). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.486046] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68284). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.496916] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 68365). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122705.612423] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 69218). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122706.531297] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 833896). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122720.863807] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 914979). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.046789] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 890090). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.088280] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 916474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.176979] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 928182). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.177593] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 927783). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.371654] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 920655). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122721.543676] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 967035). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122728.396687] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1043474). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122736.283876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 713478). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122743.576350] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 745551). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122743.889259] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 828117). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.077022] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905082). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.125005] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 905294). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.784390] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1030306). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> [122752.785053] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = dm-3, blocknr = 1031593). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
> #
>
> dm-4 is ext4 partition mounted at /var
> dm-4 is on LVM on luksCrypt on ATA drive.
>
> I'm using currently stock Debian testing kernel:
> $ uname -a
> Linux sredniczarny 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.1.0-1-686-pae (Debian 3.1.4-1) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Nov 29 19:01:56 UTC 2011
> $
>
> 32-bit intel compatible cpu
Thanks for report. Actually I was able to reproduce these messages with
data=journal mode as well when running bash_shared_mapping test. The
culprit of the problem is that block_mkwrite() as used in
ext4_page_mkwrite() marks buffers dirty and JBD2 notices this before
we clear dirty bits later in ext4_page_mkwrite() (since JBD2 doesn't use
page lock for protection when inspecting buffers). So for data=journal mode
we'll probably have to reimplement what block_page_mkwrite() does in a
slightly different manner tweaked for the needs of data=journal mode.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39882] Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Lamarque V. Souza
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39882
Subject : Kernel oops when turning bluetooth mouse on
Submitter : Lamarque V. Souza <lamarque@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-07-24 02:09 (36 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=70342
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread* [Bug #39832] HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Andreas Steinmetz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
Subject : HDA ATI HDMI: no sound with 3.0 - 2.6.39.3 works
Submitter : Andreas Steinmetz <ast-sy9/ueDX/ME@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-23 01:36 (37 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject : USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <20110722192722.GA9369-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
Subject : USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
Date : 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
Patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #40062] USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2011-08-28 19:47 ` Tino Keitel
[not found] ` <20110828194745.GA20770-WT5OiF3fLHw@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 66+ messages in thread
From: Tino Keitel @ 2011-08-28 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
> Subject : USB related "unable to handle kernel paging request" in 3.0.0-rc7
> Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>
> Date : 2011-07-22 19:27 (38 days old)
> Message-ID : <20110722192722.GA9369@x61.home>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131136334621623&w=2
> Patch : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/2/174
The patch was not added to git master or 3.0.y yet.
Regards,
Tino
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40072] suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Toralf Förster
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072
Subject : suspend/resume problems w/ kernel 3.0 and a *docked* ThinkPad T400, unless iwlagn unloaded
Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-23 19:27 (37 days old)
Message-ID : <201107232127.34255.toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131144928023465&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #39912] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39912
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x7d/0x90()
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2011-07-19 11:33 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <CAOMGZ=HS2EPkYD=5HfkSPpwPqHB5V3q0vaFmoZ8Hh+pMM9phrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131107522914558&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread* [Bug #39922] WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Lukasz Olszewski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39922
Subject : WIFI becomes EXTREMELY slow ( ath9k ) making the connection unusable
Submitter : Lukasz Olszewski <lcpak-tIkWECEXGi3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-24 09:20 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40262] PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, g0re,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
Subject : PROBLEM: I/O storm from hell on kernel 3.0.0 when touch swap (swapfile or partition)
Submitter : g0re <g0re-ifvz4xmYPRU@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-28 12:40 (32 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40092] RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Philip Armstrong
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
Subject : RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
Submitter : Philip Armstrong <phil-awZZuG094qgqdlJmJB21zg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-25 21:44 (35 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Paul Bolle
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject : INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Paul Bolle
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41092
Subject : INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:07 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-30 11:53 ` Paul Bolle
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-08-30 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
@ 2011-08-30 11:53 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-08-30 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1314705207.1989.6.camel-uMdlDhfIn7prKue/0VVhAg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
2011-08-30 11:53 ` Paul Bolle
@ 2011-08-30 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> > time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
>
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.
OK, I'll drop it from the list, then (sorry for the misplaced message BTW).
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #41092] INFO: trying to register non-static key (sync_inodes_sb)
@ 2011-08-30 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a one
> > time goof - would never have showed up in the logs [...].
>
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.
OK, I'll drop it from the list, then (sorry for the misplaced message BTW).
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-30 12:13 ` Paul Bolle
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, Paul Bolle
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
Subject : BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
Submitter : Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Date : 2011-08-13 22:29 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
2011-08-28 19:01 ` [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-30 12:13 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-08-30 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> "slub_debug".
At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
@ 2011-08-30 12:13 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2011-08-30 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>From comment #2:
> [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> "slub_debug".
At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
regression.
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1314706380.1989.8.camel-uMdlDhfIn7prKue/0VVhAg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
2011-08-30 12:13 ` Paul Bolle
@ 2011-08-30 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> > one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> > with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> > "slub_debug".
>
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.
OK, dropped from the list of recent regressions.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #41102] BUG dentry: Poison overwritten / BUG buffer_head: Poison overwritten
@ 2011-08-30 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-30 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Florian Mickler
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> From comment #2:
> > [...] please note that the 3.0.1 kernel I
> > triggered this issue with seems to be the first I ran on this machine that has
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set. So on this machine this issue - if it's more than a
> > one time goof - would never have showed up in the logs unless I manually booted
> > with "slub_debug" on the command line. And I can't remember booting with
> > "slub_debug".
>
> At this moment I see little reason to track this bug entry as a
> regression.
OK, dropped from the list of recent regressions.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40442] cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Harald Dunkel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442
Subject : cpuinfo_max_freq lost 500MHz
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harri-z+8oq0O/ijmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-02 20:31 (27 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #40282] IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Stephan Seitz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
Subject : IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
Submitter : Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-07-25 12:51 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse-S0d6l+6kcjrOGKtSYHEJQ9HuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41262] Terracted T5 does no more work
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
Eric Valette
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262
Subject : Terracted T5 does no more work
Submitter : Eric Valette <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-16 20:45 (13 days old)
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69382
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69392
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=69402
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41232] Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler,
q222-KK0ffGbhmjU
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232
Subject : Channel switching on Hauppauge Nova-T stick fails randomly
Submitter : <q222-KK0ffGbhmjU@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-16 11:33 (13 days old)
Patch : http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/aeb2d456b746164a4bd19e53de0a6678ca63fcad
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/commitdiff/45cbff13693d645fa5dcbba964e802e1746b2e57
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread
* [Bug #41562] acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
2011-08-28 18:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2011-08-28 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 66+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2011-08-28 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler, sbraz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Subject : acer-wmi: acer aspire 721 bluetooth control doesn't work with kernel 3.0.0
Submitter : sbraz <hi.sbraz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2011-08-22 18:32 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 66+ messages in thread