From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSD: Add a cache for fs_locations information
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:02:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5D5001.2030906@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314736451.10572.45.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On 08/30/2011 01:34 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:24 -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 08/30/2011 01:00 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> <>
>>>>
>>>> Won't the above check be rather expensive? You'll need to do a
>>>> getxattr call on almost every path component of every lookup,
>>>> right?
>>>>
>>>> I may be misremembering your talk from connectathon, but I thought
>>>> you were planning to use a well-known mode for junctions that would
>>>> cut down on the number of unnecessary getxattrs...
>>>
>>> Yes, that's the plan. To reduce overhead, the S_ISVTX bit must be
>>> set before NFSD does the expensive xattr test.
>
> ...and mode bits otherwise set to 0 so nobody can access the mounted-on
> directory.
>
>> from: stat(2) - Linux man page
>>
>> The 'sticky' bit (S_ISVTX) on a directory means that a file in that
>> directory can be renamed or deleted only by the owner of the file,
>> by the owner of the directory, and by a privileged process.
>>
>> Please explain how does it work? Once the junction is followed and
>> mounted then the mode-bits get changed to the destination directory's
>> mode bits? So the Server's junction mode-bits are never exposed, except
>> in a local-fs file access on the server?
>
> Yes.
>
Nice trick. Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 18:51 [PATCH] NFSD: Add a cache for fs_locations information Chuck Lever
2011-08-30 19:18 ` Jeff Layton
2011-08-30 20:00 ` Chuck Lever
2011-08-30 20:24 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-08-30 20:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-08-30 21:02 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5D5001.2030906@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.