Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ahci: Remove unused struct member

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 09.09.2011 11:43, schrieb Alexander Graf:
> 
> On 09.09.2011, at 11:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> 
>> Am 08.09.2011 21:44, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>>> Member variable is_read is written, but never read
>>> (contrary to its name).
>>
>> Nice commit message :-)
>>
>>> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
>>> ---
>>> hw/ide/ahci.c |    2 --
>>> hw/ide/ahci.h |    1 -
>>> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.c b/hw/ide/ahci.c
>>> index f4fa154..a8659cf 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ide/ahci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.c
>>> @@ -754,7 +754,6 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, uint8_t *cmd_fis,
>>>         case READ_FPDMA_QUEUED:
>>>             DPRINTF(port, "NCQ reading %d sectors from LBA %ld, tag %d\n",
>>>                     ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
>>> -            ncq_tfs->is_read = 1;
>>>
>>>             DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio read %ld\n", ncq_tfs->tag, ncq_tfs->lba);
>>>
>>> @@ -768,7 +767,6 @@ static void process_ncq_command(AHCIState *s, int port, uint8_t *cmd_fis,
>>>         case WRITE_FPDMA_QUEUED:
>>>             DPRINTF(port, "NCQ writing %d sectors to LBA %ld, tag %d\n",
>>>                     ncq_tfs->sector_count-1, ncq_tfs->lba, ncq_tfs->tag);
>>> -            ncq_tfs->is_read = 0;
>>>
>>>             DPRINTF(port, "tag %d aio write %ld\n", ncq_tfs->tag, ncq_tfs->lba);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.h b/hw/ide/ahci.h
>>> index 3c29d93..5de986c 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ide/ahci.h
>>> +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.h
>>> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ typedef struct NCQTransferState {
>>>     BlockDriverAIOCB *aiocb;
>>>     QEMUSGList sglist;
>>>     BlockAcctCookie acct;
>>> -    int is_read;
>>>     uint16_t sector_count;
>>>     uint64_t lba;
>>>     uint8_t tag;
>>
>> Alex, any specific reason you introduced it for? Is it unnecessary or is
>> it a bug that it has no user?
> 
> This is a leftover from before the code went upstream. It can easily go away :)

Great, thanks. Applied to the block branch.

Kevin