All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com (Troy Kisky)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] net/fec: set phy_speed to the optimal frequency 2.5 MHz
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:39:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E77C4A2.1060802@boundarydevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316346852-17090-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>

On 9/18/2011 4:54 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> With the unnecessary 1 bit left-shift on fep->phy_speed during the
> calculation, the phy_speed always runs at the half frequency of the
> optimal one 2.5 MHz.
>
> The patch removes that 1 bit left-shift to get the optimal phy_speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo<shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/fec.c |    2 +-
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> index 5ef0e34..04206e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	/*
>   	 * Set MII speed to 2.5 MHz (= clk_get_rate() / 2 * phy_speed)
>   	 */
> -	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000)<<  1;
> +	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000);
>   	writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
>
>   	fep->mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
Do you need to round up to an even value? Is the hardware documentation 
wrong?
Does this need a quirk? What boards has this been verified to fix?

Thanks
Troy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net/fec: set phy_speed to the optimal frequency 2.5 MHz
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:39:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E77C4A2.1060802@boundarydevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316346852-17090-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>

On 9/18/2011 4:54 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> With the unnecessary 1 bit left-shift on fep->phy_speed during the
> calculation, the phy_speed always runs at the half frequency of the
> optimal one 2.5 MHz.
>
> The patch removes that 1 bit left-shift to get the optimal phy_speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo<shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/fec.c |    2 +-
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> index 5ef0e34..04206e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	/*
>   	 * Set MII speed to 2.5 MHz (= clk_get_rate() / 2 * phy_speed)
>   	 */
> -	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000)<<  1;
> +	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000);
>   	writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
>
>   	fep->mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
Do you need to round up to an even value? Is the hardware documentation 
wrong?
Does this need a quirk? What boards has this been verified to fix?

Thanks
Troy

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-18 11:54 [PATCH 0/4] add fec support for imx6q Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] net/fec: change phy-reset-gpio request warning to debug message Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] net/fec: fix fec1 check in fec_enet_mii_init() Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] net/fec: set phy_speed to the optimal frequency 2.5 MHz Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-19 22:39   ` Troy Kisky [this message]
2011-09-19 22:39     ` Troy Kisky
2011-09-20  2:57     ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-20  2:57       ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-20 20:05       ` Troy Kisky
2011-09-20 20:05         ` Troy Kisky
2011-09-20 20:10         ` Troy Kisky
2011-09-20 20:10           ` Troy Kisky
2011-09-20  7:50   ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-09-20  7:50     ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-09-20  8:14     ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-20  8:14       ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-20 19:11       ` David Miller
2011-09-20 19:11         ` David Miller
2011-09-18 11:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] net/fec: add imx6q enet support Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 11:54   ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-18 18:09   ` Francois Romieu
2011-09-18 18:09     ` Francois Romieu
2011-09-19  9:08     ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-19  9:08       ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-20 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/4] add fec support for imx6q David Miller
2011-09-20 19:08   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E77C4A2.1060802@boundarydevices.com \
    --to=troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.