* why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ?
@ 2011-09-21 6:01 Ni Qingliang
2011-09-21 12:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ni Qingliang @ 2011-09-21 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
the linux-yocto was updated to 3.0.4, but why linux-libc-headers still
2.6.37?
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
http://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ?
2011-09-21 6:01 why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ? Ni Qingliang
@ 2011-09-21 12:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-09-21 14:37 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-09-21 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: niqingliang; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 11-09-21 02:01 AM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
> the linux-yocto was updated to 3.0.4, but why linux-libc-headers still
> 2.6.37?
They should match. In the past Khem has done the update on the
header packages, since there are nearly as many toolchain issues
with the headers as with the kernel.
I thought Khem was down as the maintainer for the libc-headers
package, but in my coffee deprived state I can't find evidence
of that.
I can bump the package, unless Khem wants to, or has different
plans.
Cheers,
Bruce
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ?
2011-09-21 12:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-09-21 14:37 ` Khem Raj
2011-09-22 1:01 ` Ni Qingliang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-09-21 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Bruce Ashfield
<bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 11-09-21 02:01 AM, Ni Qingliang wrote:
>>
>> the linux-yocto was updated to 3.0.4, but why linux-libc-headers still
>> 2.6.37?
>
> They should match. In the past Khem has done the update on the
> header packages, since there are nearly as many toolchain issues
> with the headers as with the kernel.
>
> I thought Khem was down as the maintainer for the libc-headers
> package, but in my coffee deprived state I can't find evidence
> of that.
>
> I can bump the package, unless Khem wants to, or has different
> plans.
Please go ahead. I dont have cached copy of 3.x sources here and site
it still down
thats why I am restricted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ?
2011-09-21 14:37 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-09-22 1:01 ` Ni Qingliang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ni Qingliang @ 2011-09-22 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
OK, I got it.
maybe we can manual download the package from one mirror of kernel site?
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 22:37 +0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> Please go ahead. I dont have cached copy of 3.x sources here and site
> it still down
> thats why I am restricted.
>
>
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@insigma.com.cn
http://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-22 1:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-21 6:01 why the version of "linux-libc-headers-yocto_git" stay on 2.6.37 ? Ni Qingliang
2011-09-21 12:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-09-21 14:37 ` Khem Raj
2011-09-22 1:01 ` Ni Qingliang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.