* Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing
@ 2011-10-05 15:09 Andrew Cooper
2011-10-05 16:46 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2011-10-05 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser
XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1.
The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing
23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing
2011-10-05 15:09 Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing Andrew Cooper
@ 2011-10-05 16:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-10-06 18:08 ` Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2011-10-05 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; +Cc: Ian Jackson
On 05/10/2011 16:09, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1.
>
> The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing
> 23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial.
No point ccing me on a toolstack patch. This needs to be backported, or
acked/nacked, by e.g. IanJ. ASAP preferably then we can get the next RC
rolling.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing [and 1 more messages]
2011-10-05 16:46 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2011-10-06 18:08 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2011-10-06 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser, Keir Fraser
Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing"):
> XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1.
>
> The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing
> 23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial.
Thanks for bringing this up. Next time, unless the changeset to be
backported applies correctly without manual fixups, we'd appreciate it
if you would provide an actual backport yourself. This time I did it
for you.
So, I have done this backport.
Thanks,
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-06 18:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-05 15:09 Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing Andrew Cooper
2011-10-05 16:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-10-06 18:08 ` Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.