From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <paul@paulmenage.org>,
<lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <gthelen@google.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<kirill@shutemov.name>, <avagin@parallels.com>,
<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:25:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E96A091.4000705@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013145353.161009ea.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 10/13/2011 09:53 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:24:23 +0400
> Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch converts struct sock fields memory_pressure,
>> memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem (now prot_mem)
>> to function pointers, receiving a struct mem_cgroup parameter.
>>
>> enter_memory_pressure is kept the same, since all its callers
>> have socket a context, and the kmem_cgroup can be derived from
>> the socket itself.
>>
>> To keep things working, the patch convert all users of those fields
>> to use acessor functions.
>>
>> In my benchmarks I didn't see a significant performance difference
>> with this patch applied compared to a baseline (around 1 % diff, thus
>> inside error margin).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
>> CC: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> a nitpick.
>
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> +enum {
>> + UNDER_LIMIT,
>> + OVER_LIMIT,
>> +};
>> +
>
> It may be better to move this to res_counter.h or memcontrol.h
>
Sorry Kame,
It is in memcontrol.h already. What exactly do you mean here ?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net,
gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kirill@shutemov.name, avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:25:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E96A091.4000705@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013145353.161009ea.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 10/13/2011 09:53 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:24:23 +0400
> Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch converts struct sock fields memory_pressure,
>> memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem (now prot_mem)
>> to function pointers, receiving a struct mem_cgroup parameter.
>>
>> enter_memory_pressure is kept the same, since all its callers
>> have socket a context, and the kmem_cgroup can be derived from
>> the socket itself.
>>
>> To keep things working, the patch convert all users of those fields
>> to use acessor functions.
>>
>> In my benchmarks I didn't see a significant performance difference
>> with this patch applied compared to a baseline (around 1 % diff, thus
>> inside error margin).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
>> CC: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> a nitpick.
>
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> +enum {
>> + UNDER_LIMIT,
>> + OVER_LIMIT,
>> +};
>> +
>
> It may be better to move this to res_counter.h or memcontrol.h
>
Sorry Kame,
It is in memcontrol.h already. What exactly do you mean here ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <paul@paulmenage.org>,
<lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <gthelen@google.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<kirill@shutemov.name>, <avagin@parallels.com>,
<devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:25:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E96A091.4000705@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013145353.161009ea.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 10/13/2011 09:53 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:24:23 +0400
> Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch converts struct sock fields memory_pressure,
>> memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem (now prot_mem)
>> to function pointers, receiving a struct mem_cgroup parameter.
>>
>> enter_memory_pressure is kept the same, since all its callers
>> have socket a context, and the kmem_cgroup can be derived from
>> the socket itself.
>>
>> To keep things working, the patch convert all users of those fields
>> to use acessor functions.
>>
>> In my benchmarks I didn't see a significant performance difference
>> with this patch applied compared to a baseline (around 1 % diff, thus
>> inside error margin).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@parallels.com>
>> CC: David S. Miller<davem@davemloft.net>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> a nitpick.
>
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>> +enum {
>> + UNDER_LIMIT,
>> + OVER_LIMIT,
>> +};
>> +
>
> It may be better to move this to res_counter.h or memcontrol.h
>
Sorry Kame,
It is in memcontrol.h already. What exactly do you mean here ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 10:24 [PATCH v6 0/8] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure handling Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 5:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 7:18 ` Greg Thelen
2011-10-13 7:18 ` Greg Thelen
2011-10-13 8:19 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 8:19 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 8:19 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 5:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 8:25 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-10-13 8:25 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 8:25 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] per-cgroup tcp buffers control Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 5:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 5:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-10 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] Disable task moving when using kernel memory accounting Glauber Costa
2011-10-10 10:24 ` Glauber Costa
2011-10-13 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 6:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E96A091.4000705@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=avagin@parallels.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.