From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Dmitry Koshelev <karaghiozis@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, paul@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ARM GIC and CPU state saving/loading fix
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E984DD4.50608@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKUHwZpxH2vUBb9Y_R0uPCMvPhcpNB=yJJFdmJFWfmtbG85_Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 14.10.2011 15:25, schrieb Dmitry Koshelev:
> Fixes two trivial indices errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Koshelev <karaghiozis@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/arm_gic.c | 12 ++++++------
> target-arm/machine.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm_gic.c b/hw/arm_gic.c
> index 8286a28..ba05131 100644
> --- a/hw/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/arm_gic.c
> @@ -662,9 +662,6 @@ static void gic_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->enabled);
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_CPU(s); i++) {
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->cpu_enabled[i]);
> -#ifndef NVIC
> - qemu_put_be32(f, s->irq_target[i]);
> -#endif
> for (j = 0; j < 32; j++)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->priority1[j][i]);
> for (j = 0; j < GIC_NIRQ; j++)
> @@ -678,6 +675,9 @@ static void gic_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->priority2[i]);
> }
> for (i = 0; i < GIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> +#ifndef NVIC
> + qemu_put_be32(f, s->irq_target[i]);
> +#endif
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].enabled);
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].pending);
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].active);
> @@ -699,9 +699,6 @@ static int gic_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int
> version_id)
> s->enabled = qemu_get_be32(f);
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_CPU(s); i++) {
> s->cpu_enabled[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> -#ifndef NVIC
> - s->irq_target[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> -#endif
> for (j = 0; j < 32; j++)
> s->priority1[j][i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> for (j = 0; j < GIC_NIRQ; j++)
> @@ -715,6 +712,9 @@ static int gic_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int
> version_id)
> s->priority2[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> }
> for (i = 0; i < GIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> +#ifndef NVIC
> + s->irq_target[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> +#endif
> s->irq_state[i].enabled = qemu_get_byte(f);
> s->irq_state[i].pending = qemu_get_byte(f);
> s->irq_state[i].active = qemu_get_byte(f);
This part:
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
The definition is int irq_target[GIC_NIRQ] and not [NCPU] as others.
The following part however is totally unrelated and should be put in a
separate patch. Both are non-trivial, please cc Peter Maydell instead.
> diff --git a/target-arm/machine.c b/target-arm/machine.c
> index 3925d3a..1b1b3ec 100644
> --- a/target-arm/machine.c
> +++ b/target-arm/machine.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void cpu_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, env->features);
>
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + for (i = 16; i < 32; i++) {
> CPU_DoubleU u;
> u.d = env->vfp.regs[i];
> qemu_put_be32(f, u.l.upper);
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int cpu_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> env->vfp.vec_stride = qemu_get_be32(f);
>
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP3)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + for (i = 16; i < 32; i++) {
> CPU_DoubleU u;
> u.l.upper = qemu_get_be32(f);
> u.l.lower = qemu_get_be32(f);
>
This does not look fully right either way... In addition, it touches the
storage format so any change there may require a version bump.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746, AG Nürnberg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Dmitry Koshelev <karaghiozis@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, paul@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ARM GIC and CPU state saving/loading fix
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E984DD4.50608@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKUHwZpxH2vUBb9Y_R0uPCMvPhcpNB=yJJFdmJFWfmtbG85_Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 14.10.2011 15:25, schrieb Dmitry Koshelev:
> Fixes two trivial indices errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Koshelev <karaghiozis@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/arm_gic.c | 12 ++++++------
> target-arm/machine.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm_gic.c b/hw/arm_gic.c
> index 8286a28..ba05131 100644
> --- a/hw/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/arm_gic.c
> @@ -662,9 +662,6 @@ static void gic_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->enabled);
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_CPU(s); i++) {
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->cpu_enabled[i]);
> -#ifndef NVIC
> - qemu_put_be32(f, s->irq_target[i]);
> -#endif
> for (j = 0; j < 32; j++)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->priority1[j][i]);
> for (j = 0; j < GIC_NIRQ; j++)
> @@ -678,6 +675,9 @@ static void gic_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, s->priority2[i]);
> }
> for (i = 0; i < GIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> +#ifndef NVIC
> + qemu_put_be32(f, s->irq_target[i]);
> +#endif
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].enabled);
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].pending);
> qemu_put_byte(f, s->irq_state[i].active);
> @@ -699,9 +699,6 @@ static int gic_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int
> version_id)
> s->enabled = qemu_get_be32(f);
> for (i = 0; i < NUM_CPU(s); i++) {
> s->cpu_enabled[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> -#ifndef NVIC
> - s->irq_target[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> -#endif
> for (j = 0; j < 32; j++)
> s->priority1[j][i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> for (j = 0; j < GIC_NIRQ; j++)
> @@ -715,6 +712,9 @@ static int gic_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int
> version_id)
> s->priority2[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> }
> for (i = 0; i < GIC_NIRQ; i++) {
> +#ifndef NVIC
> + s->irq_target[i] = qemu_get_be32(f);
> +#endif
> s->irq_state[i].enabled = qemu_get_byte(f);
> s->irq_state[i].pending = qemu_get_byte(f);
> s->irq_state[i].active = qemu_get_byte(f);
This part:
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
The definition is int irq_target[GIC_NIRQ] and not [NCPU] as others.
The following part however is totally unrelated and should be put in a
separate patch. Both are non-trivial, please cc Peter Maydell instead.
> diff --git a/target-arm/machine.c b/target-arm/machine.c
> index 3925d3a..1b1b3ec 100644
> --- a/target-arm/machine.c
> +++ b/target-arm/machine.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void cpu_save(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> qemu_put_be32(f, env->features);
>
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + for (i = 16; i < 32; i++) {
> CPU_DoubleU u;
> u.d = env->vfp.regs[i];
> qemu_put_be32(f, u.l.upper);
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int cpu_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> env->vfp.vec_stride = qemu_get_be32(f);
>
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP3)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> + for (i = 16; i < 32; i++) {
> CPU_DoubleU u;
> u.l.upper = qemu_get_be32(f);
> u.l.lower = qemu_get_be32(f);
>
This does not look fully right either way... In addition, it touches the
storage format so any change there may require a version bump.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746, AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 13:25 [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ARM GIC and CPU state saving/loading fix Dmitry Koshelev
2011-10-14 13:25 ` Dmitry Koshelev
2011-10-14 13:50 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-10-14 13:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-10-14 14:57 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2011-10-14 14:57 ` Andreas Färber
2011-10-14 15:04 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Paul Brook
2011-10-14 15:04 ` Paul Brook
2011-10-14 17:07 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Dmitry Koshelev
2011-10-14 17:07 ` Dmitry Koshelev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E984DD4.50608@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=karaghiozis@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.