From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>,
reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: properly go back to operational channel?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:48:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9F1B6B.1080401@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318948251.3958.29.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 10/18/2011 07:30 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:19 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>> For local->tmp_channel == NULL and local->scan_channel == NULL
>> ieee80211_cfg_on_oper_channel() will return false if
>> local->oper_channel != local->hw.conf.channel,
>> hece we do not properly go back to oper_channel from tmp_channel.
>
> Huh, good catch.
>
>> Does patch have sense?
>
> Let's see what Ben says. It seems a bit like the
> ieee80211_cfg_on_oper_channel() test there should be inverted instead of
> removed?
>
>> Could it fixes problems we are talking
>> in this thread?
>
> Yes, could be related, also some issue Jouni and Reinette have been
> seeing with P2P might be related as well.
Please see the patch I just posted. I think it fixes the
issue (which was originally reported by
Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>, who also posted a patch).
I re-worked his suggested patch to what I believe is a more
proper patch.
Also, Eliad had posted another patch that seems to be good
as is (which I also just re-posted).
Obviously, my tests cases are not catching all of these issues,
so please review the patches and/or test them out to see if
they fix the problem.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> johannes
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 11:12 [RFC] mac80211: remove per band sta supported rates Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-09-27 11:34 ` Johannes Berg
2011-09-29 15:00 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-10-04 15:07 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-05 11:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-10-05 11:22 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-18 14:19 ` [RFC] mac80211: properly go back to operational channel? Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-10-18 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-18 14:53 ` Felix Fietkau
2011-10-18 16:03 ` Ben Greear
2011-10-19 18:48 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9F1B6B.1080401@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=eliad@wizery.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.