From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
a.zummo@towertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-s3c: Add device tree support
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA5600A.3050801@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013193455.GC18574@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On 10/13/11 21:34, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:48:07PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3 September 2011 21:19, Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's rtc controller.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Ben Dooks<ben-linux@fluff.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.txt | 20
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 21
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.txt
>>>
>>> Ping. Any comments for this patch? If this looks fine, can this be
>>> considered for 3.2 merge via the Samsung kernel tree.
>>>
>> (Cc'ed Alessandro Zummo who is RTC Subsystem maintainer)
>>
>> I'm ok with this, so if this can be got the ack from Grant and Alessandro,
>> will take this.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Hi Alessandro,
Applied this in Samsung tree for supporting device tree for upcoming 3.2
merge window.
If any problems, please let me know before sending to upstream.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-s3c: Add device tree support
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA5600A.3050801@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013193455.GC18574@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On 10/13/11 21:34, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:48:07PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3 September 2011 21:19, Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Add device tree based discovery support for Samsung's rtc controller.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Ben Dooks<ben-linux@fluff.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.txt | 20
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 21
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.txt
>>>
>>> Ping. Any comments for this patch? If this looks fine, can this be
>>> considered for 3.2 merge via the Samsung kernel tree.
>>>
>> (Cc'ed Alessandro Zummo who is RTC Subsystem maintainer)
>>
>> I'm ok with this, so if this can be got the ack from Grant and Alessandro,
>> will take this.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Hi Alessandro,
Applied this in Samsung tree for supporting device tree for upcoming 3.2
merge window.
If any problems, please let me know before sending to upstream.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-24 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-03 15:49 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-s3c: Add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2011-09-03 15:49 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-11 7:05 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-11 7:05 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-11 10:48 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-10-11 10:48 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-10-13 19:34 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 19:34 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-24 12:54 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2011-10-24 12:54 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA5600A.3050801@samsung.com \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.