* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches @ 2011-11-04 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-04 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Vinod and Kukjin, Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, or keep waiting? Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches @ 2011-11-04 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-04 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul, Kukjin Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel Hi Vinod and Kukjin, Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, or keep waiting? Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches 2011-11-04 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Koul, Vinod @ 2011-11-04 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel > Hi Vinod and Kukjin, > > Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the > samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on > patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, > but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. > > Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, > or keep waiting? > Arnd, I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for these to get merged -- ~Vinod [1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1209052 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches @ 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Koul, Vinod @ 2011-11-04 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann, Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Hi Vinod and Kukjin, > > Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the > samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on > patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, > but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. > > Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, > or keep waiting? > Arnd, I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for these to get merged -- ~Vinod [1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1209052 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod @ 2011-11-04 13:17 ` Kukjin Kim -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 11/04/11 22:06, Koul, Vinod wrote: >> Hi Vinod and Kukjin, >> >> Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the >> samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on >> patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, >> but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. >> >> Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, >> or keep waiting? >> > Arnd, > > I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for > these to get merged > Arnd, So I think you can send them to Linus. And as a note, I sent next-samsung-devel-4 which includes supporting EXYNOS4 DT and reorganization mach-exynos and something to you. I hope you can pick them up with others too. If any problems, please let me know. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches @ 2011-11-04 13:17 ` Kukjin Kim 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Kukjin Kim @ 2011-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Koul, Vinod Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Kukjin Kim, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 11/04/11 22:06, Koul, Vinod wrote: >> Hi Vinod and Kukjin, >> >> Right now, all the patches from the arm-soc tree are merged into 3.2, but the >> samsung/cleanup and samsung/devel series are missing because they depend on >> patches in the dmaengine tree. I'm not sure about the status of that tree, >> but I didn't see a pull request for them yet. >> >> Should I just submit the samsung tree with the dmaengine patches included, >> or keep waiting? >> > Arnd, > > I have already sent pull request to Linus on Monday[1], still waiting for > these to get merged > Arnd, So I think you can send them to Linus. And as a note, I sent next-samsung-devel-4 which includes supporting EXYNOS4 DT and reorganization mach-exynos and something to you. I hope you can pick them up with others too. If any problems, please let me know. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-04 13:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-11-04 13:00 arm-soc samsung patches blocked on dmaengine patches Arnd Bergmann 2011-11-04 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod 2011-11-04 13:06 ` Koul, Vinod 2011-11-04 13:17 ` Kukjin Kim 2011-11-04 13:17 ` Kukjin Kim
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.