From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
"Hawrylewicz Czarnowski,
Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: HPA unlock during partition scan of RAID components
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:08:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB45467.4060605@cfl.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111104163207.GA4417@google.com>
On 11/4/2011 12:32 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Umm... partioned / mkfs'd while unlocked and bios (on whatever
> machine) locks it on later boots.
So the first machine does not set an HPA at all, you format the drive,
then move it to a machine whose bios blindly adds an HPA to the drive?
A bios certainly shouldn't be blindly adding an HPA to an already
formatted drive that did not have one before. If it does, why is that
our problem?
> No, with both sizes exposed, mdadm should be able to detect metadata
> at the end even if it was created w/ hpa locked. This is still
> fundamentally flawed as if you move it to another machine, it may be
> locked in completely different way, but that's as far as we can go.
So mdadm could check both places after the kernel always unlocks,
without any heuristic? And when creating an array, it would write it to
the real, unlocked end of the disk, possibly trashing whatever the bios
has stored there?
> Upto userspace how? Unlock it after root is mounted?
Or in the initramfs. Or just deal with it as part of the upgrade
process, as I suggested before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-04 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <74AAB12B538EC94087A0D16AFDFC24F4045674@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
2011-11-03 15:54 ` HPA unlock during partition scan of RAID components Tejun Heo
2011-11-03 19:00 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-04 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-04 15:42 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-04 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-04 16:26 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-04 16:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-04 21:08 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2011-11-04 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-05 1:29 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-05 1:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-05 2:26 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-05 2:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-05 3:50 ` Phillip Susi
2011-11-03 20:46 ` NeilBrown
2011-11-03 21:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 0:50 ` Charles Nordlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB45467.4060605@cfl.rr.com \
--to=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.