All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Konstantin Ozerkov <kozerkov@parallels.com>
Cc: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Wierd hack to sound/pci/intel8x0.c
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:51:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB69EDA.5000901@redhat.com> (raw)

The recently merged 228cf79376f1 ("ALSA: intel8x0: Improve performance
in virtual environment") is hacky and somewhat wrong.

First, the detection code

+       if (inside_vm < 0) {
+               /* detect KVM and Parallels virtual environments */
+               inside_vm = kvm_para_available();
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+               inside_vm = inside_vm ||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR);
+#endif
+       }
+
 
is incorrect.  It detects that you're running in a guest, but that
doesn't imply that the device you're accessing is emulated.  It may be a
host device assigned to the guest; presumably the optimization you apply
doesn't work for real devices.

Second, the optimization itself looks fishy:

        spin_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
        do {
                civ = igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset + ICH_REG_OFF_CIV);
                ptr1 = igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb);
                position = ichdev->position;
                if (ptr1 == 0) {
                        udelay(10);
                        continue;
                }
-               if (civ == igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ICH_REG_OFF_CIV) &&
-                   ptr1 == igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb))
+               if (civ != igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ICH_REG_OFF_CIV))
+                       continue;
+               if (chip->inside_vm)
+                       break;
+               if (ptr1 == igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb))
                        break;
        } while (timeout--);


Why is the emulated device timing out?  Can't the emulation be fixed to
behave like real hardware?

Last, please copy kvm@vger.kernel.org on such issues.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Konstantin Ozerkov <kozerkov@parallels.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Wierd hack to sound/pci/intel8x0.c
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:51:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB69EDA.5000901@redhat.com> (raw)

The recently merged 228cf79376f1 ("ALSA: intel8x0: Improve performance
in virtual environment") is hacky and somewhat wrong.

First, the detection code

+       if (inside_vm < 0) {
+               /* detect KVM and Parallels virtual environments */
+               inside_vm = kvm_para_available();
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+               inside_vm = inside_vm ||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR);
+#endif
+       }
+
 
is incorrect.  It detects that you're running in a guest, but that
doesn't imply that the device you're accessing is emulated.  It may be a
host device assigned to the guest; presumably the optimization you apply
doesn't work for real devices.

Second, the optimization itself looks fishy:

        spin_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
        do {
                civ = igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset + ICH_REG_OFF_CIV);
                ptr1 = igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb);
                position = ichdev->position;
                if (ptr1 == 0) {
                        udelay(10);
                        continue;
                }
-               if (civ == igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ICH_REG_OFF_CIV) &&
-                   ptr1 == igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb))
+               if (civ != igetbyte(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ICH_REG_OFF_CIV))
+                       continue;
+               if (chip->inside_vm)
+                       break;
+               if (ptr1 == igetword(chip, ichdev->reg_offset +
ichdev->roff_picb))
                        break;
        } while (timeout--);


Why is the emulated device timing out?  Can't the emulation be fixed to
behave like real hardware?

Last, please copy kvm@vger.kernel.org on such issues.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

             reply	other threads:[~2011-11-06 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-06 14:51 Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-11-06 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] Wierd hack to sound/pci/intel8x0.c Avi Kivity
2011-11-06 16:15 ` Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:15   ` [Qemu-devel] " Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:15   ` Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:31   ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-06 16:31     ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-11-06 16:47     ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-06 16:47       ` [Qemu-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2011-11-06 16:56       ` Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:56         ` [Qemu-devel] " Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:50     ` Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:50       ` [Qemu-devel] " Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:50       ` Denis V. Lunev
2011-11-06 16:33   ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-06 16:33     ` [Qemu-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2011-11-06 16:33     ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-07  9:25     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-11-07  9:25       ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2011-11-07  9:52       ` Konstantin Ozerkov
2011-11-07  9:52         ` [Qemu-devel] " Konstantin Ozerkov
2011-11-07 10:35         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-11-07 10:35           ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2011-11-07 10:45           ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-07 10:45             ` [Qemu-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2011-11-07 10:45             ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-07 10:44       ` Takashi Iwai
2011-11-07 10:44         ` [Qemu-devel] " Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB69EDA.5000901@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=kozerkov@parallels.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.